![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric,
I don't recall if my A had a prohibition against spinning in landing flap. However, to avoid overspeeding the flaps I would immediately move the flap handle forward after the first half rotation. I had assumed when I bought the glider that the upturned ailerons in landing flap position would prevent dramatic autorotation, but this wasn't the case. I think the 20 developed a bad reputation because pilots were setting the landing flaps on downwind rather than waiting until final approach. The 20 definitely handles less pleasantly, especially in turns and turbulence with the landing flaps down. With full flaps on the A, the nose angle at stall was below the horizon. Just another thing to get used to. I have to say I think George T. went a little overboard in charcaterizing the 20 as a dangerous glider. Like all fast glass, it requires additional energy management skills and a respect for the altitude it will need to recover if abused. I see it as no less safe or dangerous than a Discus. Perhaps more complex, but that's a training issue. That's not nostalgia talking. I prefer newer gliders... they are better harmonized, easier to put together, climb and glide better. But the 20 (2nd gen) has the same management issues as third generation flapped ships (V2, ASW-27) and newer gliders are no less disposed to bite their masters if mishandled. There's nothing inherent in the glider that would presdispose it to accidents. But like all fast glass, it will accentuate pilot ignorance. As for George's complaints against manual control hookups, well, this is a fact of life. I would guess that 3/4 of all ships in service have manual hookups. Again, a training issue. Pilots who follow the manufactures' assembly instructions and best practices (double inspection, critical assembly check, positive control check) don't have problems. Control failures can almost always be traced back to poor maintenance or a mistake in the assembly and inspection sequence. There are some inherently poor designs, but the 20's hotellier fittings are not among them. And after market safety devices are available to address their known weaknesses (or more correctly, weakness in the assembler). Are automatic control hookups better...? You bet! But that doesn't make manual hookups inherently unsafe. They simply require more attention. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Spin Training | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 6 | February 16th 04 04:49 PM |
spin characteristics of new racers | Andy Durbin | Soaring | 14 | January 31st 04 06:05 AM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |