A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How Low to Spin??



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 25th 04, 09:42 PM
Mark James Boyd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Eric Greenwell wrote:

Just to be clear here, the convention is: 0% is at the front of the
range; 100% is at the aft end of the range. It sounds like you have it
backwards.


My mistake. I wasn't expecting you to have flown
aircraft in such an aft CG range, and inverted it in my mind.

Really. So the aircraft were in the aft 1/3 of the range?
And still wouldn't stall at 45 deg bank? Interesting...

I believe you, I'd just like to see this myself as well.

As far as stalls in a steep bank, without uncoordinated
inputs, I've noticed many aircraft roll wings level,
just like the GFH and AFH (and Marc, it seems) say...

One thing I haven't tried that I recall is banking into
a turn and then just failing to take rudder out
while rolling level at a high rate (all while at low
airspeed). This should get a nice spin entry too...

Maybe there are spin fatalities in this category too...steep
bank close to the ground, more elevator to tighten the
turn to final, then an attempt at a quick roll to level wings...
--

------------+
Mark Boyd
Avenal, California, USA
  #2  
Old August 25th 04, 09:59 PM
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark James Boyd wrote:

Eric Greenwell wrote:

Just to be clear here, the convention is: 0% is at the front of the
range; 100% is at the aft end of the range. It sounds like you have it
backwards.



My mistake. I wasn't expecting you to have flown
aircraft in such an aft CG range, and inverted it in my mind.

Really. So the aircraft were in the aft 1/3 of the range?
And still wouldn't stall at 45 deg bank? Interesting...


70% is a common CG location, because (for many/most gliders, especially
the newer they are) the glider handles pleasantly, recovers easily from
spins, and is close to the optimum CG for cross-country performance.


I believe you, I'd just like to see this myself as well.


The limit on elevator "authority" isn't so much the force it can
generate (except at the most forward positions) but more the angle of
attack reduction on the elevator that occurs in steep turns. I'm sure
the bank angle you can stall at is higher with a more aft CG, but in the
commonly used 60-80% range, you do run out of elevator in the steeper turns.

--
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
SR22 Spin Recovery gwengler Piloting 9 September 24th 04 07:31 AM
Spin Training JJ Sinclair Soaring 6 February 16th 04 04:49 PM
Cessna 150 Price Outlook Charles Talleyrand Owning 80 October 16th 03 02:18 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.