![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell wrote:
Just to be clear here, the convention is: 0% is at the front of the range; 100% is at the aft end of the range. It sounds like you have it backwards. My mistake. I wasn't expecting you to have flown aircraft in such an aft CG range, and inverted it in my mind. Really. So the aircraft were in the aft 1/3 of the range? And still wouldn't stall at 45 deg bank? Interesting... I believe you, I'd just like to see this myself as well. As far as stalls in a steep bank, without uncoordinated inputs, I've noticed many aircraft roll wings level, just like the GFH and AFH (and Marc, it seems) say... One thing I haven't tried that I recall is banking into a turn and then just failing to take rudder out while rolling level at a high rate (all while at low airspeed). This should get a nice spin entry too... Maybe there are spin fatalities in this category too...steep bank close to the ground, more elevator to tighten the turn to final, then an attempt at a quick roll to level wings... -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark James Boyd wrote:
Eric Greenwell wrote: Just to be clear here, the convention is: 0% is at the front of the range; 100% is at the aft end of the range. It sounds like you have it backwards. My mistake. I wasn't expecting you to have flown aircraft in such an aft CG range, and inverted it in my mind. Really. So the aircraft were in the aft 1/3 of the range? And still wouldn't stall at 45 deg bank? Interesting... 70% is a common CG location, because (for many/most gliders, especially the newer they are) the glider handles pleasantly, recovers easily from spins, and is close to the optimum CG for cross-country performance. I believe you, I'd just like to see this myself as well. The limit on elevator "authority" isn't so much the force it can generate (except at the most forward positions) but more the angle of attack reduction on the elevator that occurs in steep turns. I'm sure the bank angle you can stall at is higher with a more aft CG, but in the commonly used 60-80% range, you do run out of elevator in the steeper turns. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
SR22 Spin Recovery | gwengler | Piloting | 9 | September 24th 04 07:31 AM |
Spin Training | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 6 | February 16th 04 04:49 PM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |