![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heh, I hope Schweizer makes better helicopters than they did gliders.
They do make good helicopters. The 300 are based on the Hughes 269 type cert. As for gliders, they seem to have withstood the test of time. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's hard to beat the 1-26 for a fun day on the ridge. If you haven't flown
one for a while, you should go rent one. They are an absolute blast to fly. It's the most maneuverable ship I've ever flown. Gary Boggs "Shaber CJ" wrote in message ... Heh, I hope Schweizer makes better helicopters than they did gliders. They do make good helicopters. The 300 are based on the Hughes 269 type cert. As for gliders, they seem to have withstood the test of time. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gary Boggs" wrote
It's hard to beat the 1-26 for a fun day on the ridge. If you haven't flown one for a while, you should go rent one. They are an absolute blast to fly. It's the most maneuverable ship I've ever flown. I used to love the 1-26 when I first flew it, but then I flew a Ka-8. Just as docile, just as old, just as cheap to buy - and a better flying ship in every way. Michael |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael" wrote in message om... I used to love the 1-26 when I first flew it, but then I flew a Ka-8. Just as docile, just as old, just as cheap to buy - and a better flying ship in every way. ...and 4 notches better on L/D but with a wooden wing. Not sure I would want to tie one outside in South Florida, something that is no problem with a 1-26. Vaughn |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Vaughn" wrote
I used to love the 1-26 when I first flew it, but then I flew a Ka-8. Just as docile, just as old, just as cheap to buy - and a better flying ship in every way. ...and 4 notches better on L/D but with a wooden wing. Not sure I would want to tie one outside in South Florida, something that is no problem with a 1-26. Outside tiedown for rag-and-tube aircraft is bad enough when it's dry - then you just destroy the fabric. You ever recover a fuselage with fabric? I have. It's not complicated, but oh man is it ever a bitch to do. For the effort you put into recovering the fuselage once, you could have built a primitive hangar. In Florida, it's worse. Salty rain gets into the fuselage and the tubes rust. Then, when you take the fabric off, you have a huge amount of sanding and priming to do, and likely some welding as well. The 1-26E is not so bad - it only has fabric tailfeathers, and those you can recover in a long weekend. Outside tiedown is something you really should only do on all-metal aircraft, and then only inland. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 07:17 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |