![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bert Willing wrote:
Exactly. Just a bunch of say 50,000 arrogant European pilots who think that it's an ugly ship and who rather spend $15,000 on a second hand ship having much more performance... Remember a high number of pilots among these 50,000 are not owning nor buying any glider, but just fly club gliders. And the choice of which glider a club should buy is another thing. If a glider costs twice the price of a PW5, but flies twice the number of hours a PW5 would fly because of better performance, there is no hesitation on the choice. My club owned 2 old gliders (wood, metal frame and fabric) that were donated, not sold, some years ago because the annual number of hours they were flown were not worth the simple cost of maintaining them airworthy. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Robert Ehrlich wrote: Bert Willing wrote: Exactly. Just a bunch of say 50,000 arrogant European pilots who think that it's an ugly ship and who rather spend $15,000 on a second hand ship having much more performance... Remember a high number of pilots among these 50,000 are not owning nor buying any glider, but just fly club gliders. And the choice of which glider a club should buy is another thing. If a glider costs twice the price of a PW5, but flies twice the number of hours a PW5 would fly because of better performance, there is no hesitation on the choice. My club owned 2 old gliders (wood, metal frame and fabric) that were donated, not sold, some years ago because the annual number of hours they were flown were not worth the simple cost of maintaining them airworthy. The flip side is the 1-34 that BASA owns. They have a DG1000, grob 103, and pegasi, but kept the 1-34 because it's just so dang cheap to maintain. And a local power FBO just sold two 152s and a 172 to buy a brand new 172 because it's less maintenance. So I think the door swings both ways. Operators may buy or keep old stuff that is sturdy, and discard old stuff that breaks a lot. The L-13 seems to be a good example. Old, and with lots of parts, but it doesn't need a new gelcoat, so it makes a good tiedown glider. But an old glider with wood wings? Man, now you're talkin' el rotto... -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Germany Lost the War... So What? | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 55 | February 26th 04 08:51 AM |
World War II Flying 'Ace' Salutes Racial Progress, By Gerry J. Gilmore | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 2 | February 22nd 04 03:33 AM |
One Design viability? | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 41 | December 10th 03 03:27 AM |
PW-5 and NHRA Pro Stock Trucks........ | Scott Correa | Soaring | 1 | November 22nd 03 02:27 AM |