![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Let me see if I got this straight, Mark. You are advocating an early finish followed by an attempt to better your speed and if that fails, you plan to beat it back home so as to make the flight documentation time, in order to claim your short task speed? Do I have that right, Mark? If I were the CD, I would land you at your engine start point (for distance points only) and probably give you an un-sportsman-like penalty for trying to manipulate the rules. I will add your example to a growing list of motor glider abuses that I hope will lead to some constraints being placed on motor gliders when they are allowed to compete with pure sailplanes. JJ Sinclair At 20:30 29 August 2004, Mark Zivley wrote: For the case of adding a turnpoint, if you're a motorglider (which we were) you COULD get back to the finish airport after cranking out the motor, land, and get your landing info in w/o too much trouble as long as you were less than say 40 miles away from the finish airport. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,
Hold on a second here and please don't get too carried away. 1. Everyone at the contest was a motorglider so there was no unfair advantage to having a motor in this particular case. 2. From the word go, I'm not looking for a score change, just some clarification on the rules. As I mentioned, even if there was a score change it would have had no impact on the day or the total. 3. It was quite possible for us to have avoided the 2 mile radius finish circle at the time we were "surviving" as it looked like the day was going to re-cycle. If we had not touched the finish circle then there should have been no question that we could have gone back to turn area 2 with the additional altitude that we had earned and generated a point that was deeper into turn 2 that would have given us more credit for distance and therefore speed. 4. Let's not get too carried away w/ "unsportsmanlike" conduct. I simply have pointed out an example that did really occur. It's not unsportsmanlike to go to the finish point and use it as a turn point and then head back out in the hopes that you can tack on one more turnpoint. If you make it to an additional turn point and come back to the finish point you have the option (motorglider or not) to decide at the time that you fill in your landing card as to whether you claim the additional turn point or not. True? Remember, I'm not ranting and raving here, just pointing out what happened so it can be clarified (hopefully) as we go forward. Mark |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Special Flight Setup Question (COF) | Dudley Henriques | Simulators | 4 | October 11th 03 12:14 AM |
History of Contest Scoring | Bill Feldbaumer | Soaring | 8 | October 8th 03 02:14 PM |
new TASKs and SCORING - or roll the dice | CH | Soaring | 0 | August 10th 03 07:32 AM |