![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 16:16:30 UTC, "F.L. Whiteley"
wrote: : Personally I can't believe a UK basic instructor is saying this publicly. : Are you still giving ab-initio lessons? Perhaps you should chant this, or : something like WULFSTALL, in the circuit and think about what each item is : and what the implications are if you don't do each one. There is a lot of honest debate about how many of these are truly necessary. For example, is your "W" for wind? If so, it should have been checked a hell of a long time before trying to join the "circuit". And if it has been, and the circuit planned to take account of it, why specifically check again? Doesn't the practice of good airmanship imply that this will be done anyway? Similarly with T for Trim. Surely anyone who has been reasonably trained with use the trimmer without thinking about it for any long term change in speed? Why make it a separate item in a check list at a time when maximum attention should be gven to lookout? I have had experienced full cat instructors tell me that they didn't advocate any down wind checks at all, per se, as they claimed that every single one should be a consequence of good airmanship. I don't go that far myself, but the only ones which is seems to me might be seens as circuit extras are Undercarriage (check only, should be down already), Speed, Airbrakes (in case frozen). Everything else should have been done before or is plain bleeding obvious. Do you really, truly, know people who wouldn't check the intended landing area unless they had a mnemonic? If so, should they be flying? [I think I know one, and I don't think he should be.] Ian PS If the F is for Flaps for the small proportion of gliders with 'em, what about the other W for Water? Mind you, I had one instructor who used the F for "Fag (extinguish and chuck out of DV panel)"... -- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Johnston" wrote in message news:cCUlhtvFIYkV-pn2-V8pRq3LwYqPX@localhost... Similarly with T for Trim. Surely anyone who has been reasonably trained with use the trimmer without thinking about it for any long term change in speed? Why make it a separate item in a check list at a time when maximum attention should be gven to lookout? Ian PS If the F is for Flaps for the small proportion of gliders with 'em, what about the other W for Water? Mind you, I had one instructor who used the F for "Fag (extinguish and chuck out of DV panel)"... -- I tend to set trim a bit nose heavy for the landing pattern. That way if my attention is diverted from airspeed control for a second of two, at least the glider will want to increase airspeed on its own. That's a different use of trim than the usual trimming for the exact airspeed. The way I think some pilots may get into trouble is if the trim is set for thermalling while scratching for that last thermal but then they give up and turn in to land, and forget to re-trim, that leaves the glider trimmed a bit nose up for the normal pattern speed. If their attention is diverted, the airspeed may drop toward stall. Bill Daniels |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Johnston wrote:
circuit extras are Undercarriage (check only, should be down already), Speed, Airbrakes (in case frozen). USA! I love it. U (because I've seen several gear-ups). S (because it reminds one to turn early or late on downwind, and compensate for headwind/look at the sock), also, many landing accidents are undershoots. A (less important, but worthy of a check to ensure you don't have a flap handle (L-13), and that they actually unlock) Everything else should have been done before or is plain bleeding obvious. Yep, the rest could be further down the list... I had one instructor who used the F for "Fag (extinguish and chuck out of DV panel)"... LOL! I had to read this one twice... -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
SR22 Spin Recovery | gwengler | Piloting | 9 | September 24th 04 07:31 AM |
Spin Training | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 6 | February 16th 04 04:49 PM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |