A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

CAI 302 security failed message



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 14th 04, 10:59 AM
Ian Strachan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article 5bs1d.43915$D%.38664@attbi_s51, Paul Remde
writes
Hi,

If the file is indicated as not secure when downloading with the PC utility
the 302 is most likely not sealed. The status of the seal is displayed on
one of the 302 LCD screens. I suggest you check that.

If it is not sealed you will need to send it back to Cambridge to be
re-sealed.


Certain Cambridge agents can also carry out the re-sealing. These are
not the normal sales agents, but those specially authorised by Cambridge
to carry out modifications and other internal work on their recorders.
Work that does not need to open up the sealed box, such as pressure
altitude calibrations, is different and is carried out by any
calibration organisation that is approved by the gliding NAC (SSA for
USA, BGA for the UK).

In general, the servicing agent authorised to work "inside" will check
that nothing has been altered inside the box, run a check on the
recorder unit, check internal connections etc for integrity, upgrade any
firmware (if the customer wants this, always a good thing to do) and
then the box is ready to re-seal. The agent contacts Cambridge and gets
a special re-sealing code that will only work with that particular
recorder. This is so that the code cannot be used again for a whole
series of recorders.

Other manufacturers have similar arrangements for secure re-sealing.

I do not know what the situation is in North America, any work inside
the sealed box (including re-sealing) may all have to be done at
Cambridge itself at Horn Lake, MI.

However, in the UK, RD Aviation (Oxford) and also Bicester Aviation
Services (Bicester) are allowed to carry out internal work on Cambridge
recorders, to avoid transatlantic travel for the recorder box. Similar
arrangements exist for some other countries.

I hope that puts the situation on re-sealing and servicing in
perspective.

--
Ian Strachan
Chairman IGC GFA Committee



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GWB has been a good Commander-in-Chief Horvath Military Aviation 112 August 25th 04 12:00 AM
16 Aug 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 17th 04 12:37 AM
For Keith Willshaw... robert arndt Military Aviation 253 July 6th 04 05:18 AM
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) Anonymous Spamless Military Aviation 0 April 21st 04 05:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.