![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
* if I am very familiar with the area, then the moving
map adds very little I politely disagree. If you get low, it's REALLY nice to see, at a glance, all the fields within reach. This was my prime reason for going with a moving map (GN II). I agree. In the ongoing analog vs. digital debate, it's undeniable that a quick glance at a moving map (e.g., Glide Navigator II) with all the landing fields in your vicinity displayed with little circles around the ones you can glide to (net of the wind, MacCready setting, and arrival height margin) is much better than pulling up and reading a sorted list. At least for me, that's a very useful feature even when flying within my local area. Chip Bearden ASW 24 "JB" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SNav / LNav Question | Dan Pitman | Soaring | 4 | September 2nd 04 08:40 PM |