![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Bela,
Good point. Many people fly with Pocket PCs connected to their 302s. However, Pocket PCs with soaring flight software can be connected to any of the GPS flight recorders listed in the comparison with similar results (moving map, final glide, etc.), so I'm not sure that it would be fair to list that only with the 302. Does that make sense? My plan is the leave the comparison as it is and add more detail to my soaring flight computer comparison when it is completed (soon I hope). I already list a complete system with a 302 and Pocket PC on my Example Systems page. Good Soaring, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. http://www.cumulus-soaring.com "Bela" wrote in message om... Paul, if I did not happen to own a Cambridge 302 / 304 combo your chart would make me think that I don't have moving map, navigation, airspace, etc. functions. Bela |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Paul,
I never bothered to evaluate the various systems before I bought mine, simply followed the recommendation of an experienced racer & multiple record holder pilot friend and am happy with his choice. Therefore I know next to nothing about the other systems. This may be a tall order, but could you somehow cross reference compatibility with the various Pocket PCs suported AND the software capabilities they run? This would probably take two additional matrix, but what the heck, the winter months are coming... :-) If my friend did not tell me about GNII I would still be running the original CAI software... Bela "Paul Remde" wrote in message news:Y7xkd.392323$D%.29439@attbi_s51... Hi Bela, Good point. Many people fly with Pocket PCs connected to their 302s. However, Pocket PCs with soaring flight software can be connected to any of the GPS flight recorders listed in the comparison with similar results (moving map, final glide, etc.), so I'm not sure that it would be fair to list that only with the 302. Does that make sense? My plan is the leave the comparison as it is and add more detail to my soaring flight computer comparison when it is completed (soon I hope). I already list a complete system with a 302 and Pocket PC on my Example Systems page. Good Soaring, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. http://www.cumulus-soaring.com "Bela" wrote in message om... Paul, if I did not happen to own a Cambridge 302 / 304 combo your chart would make me think that I don't have moving map, navigation, airspace, etc. functions. Bela |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Bela,
I'm sorry, but I'm not sure I understand what you're looking for. Any Pocket PC can run most any flight software. Conversely, most all software runs on most all Pocket PCs. That is not completely correct - some software won't run on the older Compaq Aero 1550 units. I have a detailed comparison of flight software he http://www.cumulus-soaring.com/software-ppc.htm If you look down at the bottom half of the table it lists how well each program connects to a variety of soaring flight computers and flight recorders. Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. http://www.cumulus-soaring.com "Bela" wrote in message om... Hi Paul, I never bothered to evaluate the various systems before I bought mine, simply followed the recommendation of an experienced racer & multiple record holder pilot friend and am happy with his choice. Therefore I know next to nothing about the other systems. This may be a tall order, but could you somehow cross reference compatibility with the various Pocket PCs suported AND the software capabilities they run? This would probably take two additional matrix, but what the heck, the winter months are coming... :-) If my friend did not tell me about GNII I would still be running the original CAI software... Bela "Paul Remde" wrote in message news:Y7xkd.392323$D%.29439@attbi_s51... Hi Bela, Good point. Many people fly with Pocket PCs connected to their 302s. However, Pocket PCs with soaring flight software can be connected to any of the GPS flight recorders listed in the comparison with similar results (moving map, final glide, etc.), so I'm not sure that it would be fair to list that only with the 302. Does that make sense? My plan is the leave the comparison as it is and add more detail to my soaring flight computer comparison when it is completed (soon I hope). I already list a complete system with a 302 and Pocket PC on my Example Systems page. Good Soaring, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. http://www.cumulus-soaring.com "Bela" wrote in message om... Paul, if I did not happen to own a Cambridge 302 / 304 combo your chart would make me think that I don't have moving map, navigation, airspace, etc. functions. Bela |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Craggy Aero Electronic Flight Recorder Calibration Services | RHP | Soaring | 0 | August 29th 04 05:42 PM |
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan | gwengler | Piloting | 3 | August 9th 04 08:39 PM |
Date of effect now 1 October 2004 for revised IGC-approvals for certain legacy types of GNSS flight recorder | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 0 | March 15th 04 02:32 PM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |