A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Angaar



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 28th 04, 06:14 PM
John Galloway
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

At 08:00 28 November 2004, Tanel wrote:
Palju sellise asja ehitamine vőiks maksta?
http://www.portmoak.force9.co.uk/new...os_3.htm#entry


I don't know what the comment about the new Portmoak
'glider store' means but there are also 2 earlier series
of construction photos on the Scottish Gliding Centre
website ...._photos_2.htm and ....._photos_1.htm

http://www.portmoak.force9.co.uk/introduction.htm#entry

We think there is unlikely to be a hangar with a significantly
higher storage density.

John Galloway


  #2  
Old November 28th 04, 08:05 PM
tango4
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Galloway" wrote in message
...
At 08:00 28 November 2004, Tanel wrote:
Palju sellise asja ehitamine vőiks maksta?
http://www.portmoak.force9.co.uk/new...os_3.htm#entry


I don't know what the comment about the new Portmoak
'glider store' means but there are also 2 earlier series
of construction photos on the Scottish Gliding Centre
website ...._photos_2.htm and ....._photos_1.htm

http://www.portmoak.force9.co.uk/introduction.htm#entry

We think there is unlikely to be a hangar with a significantly
higher storage density.

John Galloway



The 'Cape Hangars' in Worcester South Africa used the same design perhaps 15
or more years ago. In addition to the bottom row of gliders a number of
Libelles and other light ships were hoisted into the roof which was a little
higher than the portmoak 'pretender'. :-)

Ian


  #3  
Old December 1st 04, 05:14 PM
OscarCVox
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The ultimate in inefficiancy must be the T4 hanger at Lasham. A great big
hanger with one end blocked off so gliders can only be loaded at the other.
Tough luck if yours is right at the back. Remove 25 + gliders, remove yours,
replace 25+ gliders. A recipe for hanger rash if I ever saw one
  #4  
Old November 29th 04, 12:24 PM
JS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



http://www.portmoak.force9.co.uk/introduction.htm#entry

We think there is unlikely to be a hangar with a significantly
higher storage density.

John Galloway


Not with private direct entrance/exit for every glider, anyhow. I consider
the construction as the traditional glider hangar. Ordinary large halls
(maybe with doors on both ends) can be packed equally dense, maybe even
more, but getting only the last/midmost glider out is painfull. I didn't
found any ratios describing gliders per area or ?'s per glider, did anyone
else..?

js


  #5  
Old December 2nd 04, 02:21 PM
Tanel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I tried to post this link into an estonian newsgroup, but sent it
accidentaly here. We need a cheap hangar for 10 gligers and any good
ideas or fotos are welcome.
Tanel
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.