![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Galloway" wrote in message ... At 08:00 28 November 2004, Tanel wrote: Palju sellise asja ehitamine vőiks maksta? http://www.portmoak.force9.co.uk/new...os_3.htm#entry I don't know what the comment about the new Portmoak 'glider store' means but there are also 2 earlier series of construction photos on the Scottish Gliding Centre website ...._photos_2.htm and ....._photos_1.htm http://www.portmoak.force9.co.uk/introduction.htm#entry We think there is unlikely to be a hangar with a significantly higher storage density. John Galloway The 'Cape Hangars' in Worcester South Africa used the same design perhaps 15 or more years ago. In addition to the bottom row of gliders a number of Libelles and other light ships were hoisted into the roof which was a little higher than the portmoak 'pretender'. :-) Ian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The ultimate in inefficiancy must be the T4 hanger at Lasham. A great big
hanger with one end blocked off so gliders can only be loaded at the other. Tough luck if yours is right at the back. Remove 25 + gliders, remove yours, replace 25+ gliders. A recipe for hanger rash if I ever saw one |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|