![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
David Bingham wrote: Hi Gang For approximately 30 years the performance of gliders has hardly advanced at all and yet we now have the tools (computer programs) and much stronger materials (carbon composites) to surely advance the state of the art of gliders. Has this happened? Yes there are marginal improvements but so small. What's the reason for this slowdown in innovation? Not enough glider pilots. 625 thousand active pilots in the USA (based on medicals applied for). Maybe 1 in 30 fly gliders. Van's making a self-launch LSA glider would be a big help. I recently was counseling a Park Ranger who flies a Husky on patrol. She told me she wanted to improve her radio calls and thought also that an IFR rating would help. I told her based on the mountains she flies around, glider training would be much more valuable. She was quite surprised. If we get more glider pilots, we'll get enough mass to get the innovations going. Turbine powered gliders, LSA transitions, and the Sparrowhawks of the community are a good start... I don't believe it has much to do with classes. There are a lot of people on RAS that care, but of the 20,000 others, most just get a glider they like... I believe in no small part it is due to the sailplane classes. With the establishing of the classes that are so rigid and, in my mind, so restrictive, innovation has suffered. What a breath of fresh air the SparrowHawk is! However there is no sailplane class for it. So I got to thinking. Is the present setup of the classes rational, reasonable? Could a better system be envisioned? OK, taking this further if there were no classes today, and it was suggested to set up classes, what would they look like? I think closer to what I'm suggesting than what they are now. I hope my posting keeps the gang thinking. A couple of specific comments: It is true Greg Cole required me to write him a check before demoing the SparrowHawk but he also told me he would return the check if I didn't like it. Bob K wrote: "So, if these classes were suddenly instituted tomorrow, would you compete in them?" A tough question. I just might participate in a class 1 competition if were held close to home. Dave -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ultralight sailplane aerotow liability | Caracole | Soaring | 18 | April 1st 04 09:17 PM |
AL-12: New ultralight sailplane | ISoar | Soaring | 4 | March 24th 04 01:52 AM |
Any sailplane pilots? | Larry Dighera | Soaring | 99 | January 7th 04 03:46 AM |
An Historical Perspective on the Wright Accomplishment | Gary Osoba | Soaring | 5 | December 19th 03 12:35 AM |
Electro-self-launching sailplane | clement | Soaring | 5 | September 12th 03 05:03 AM |