![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Barnyard BOb -- wrote:
Smart ass punk, Ernest Christley... If 50 years of flight, all my ratings and many thousands of hours make me a snot nosed ****er, where do you think that places you in the food chain? I was waiting for you to reply with that, Bob. Such a predictable fish. Straight out of college, I started with a Fortune 100 that will rename nameless, except to say that they built business machnines internationally. All smart, green and full of vigor. Got put on the leading feature for the next release. Not to get to technical with something other than aviation, but this product depended upon a hash table as a central data repository. A hash table is a data structure that is designed to make storing and finding sparse data fast and efficient. You take the data you want to store, 'hash' it to get a value, and use that value as an index into a table where the data will go. The central element here is speed. The system was limited by the speed of the hash table, and the speed of the hash table is limited in many ways by the efficiency of the hashing algorithm. My team started to base our hash table off of one used in the product the we were extending. I took a close look at the hashing algorithm used, and it was based on an even earlier product. But the earlier product was a totally different beast that had only a cursory simularity to what we were working on. Did I mention that hashing algorithms should be application specific? For our application, the proposed solution was dog slow. Fortunately, the previous 'engineer' was still around. So, I went to ask why she had used that particular solution. She got huffy and practically screamed that 'it had worked before!!' OK. But this was a different situation. I set up test cases for a head-to-head comparison, and demonstrated a 30% speed increase on live code. But still all she had to say was, "It can't be changed, because it worked before." The team unanimously chose to implement my algorithm over the one chosen by a engineer with 30yrs of service. Why? Because I applied my brain to the actual situation, improved the product, and was able to test and document substantial improvements. All that to say, 50 years of sniffing pesticides while just barely managing to not get decapitated by a powerline doesn't necessarily mean that you have all the answers. In fact, it doesn't mean that you necessarily have ANY answers. From what you post here, I'd have to assume that it means little more than that you're a trained monkey who knows little more than how to handle his own stick. What do you add to the conversation? How have you advanced the state of aviation? Have you ever tried an experiment to improve an airplane's performance? Did you document what you did and what your results were? If you did experiment, how do you justify departing from the safe status quo, and more importantly how did you avoid becoming a statistic? If not why are you such a blow hard dragging down our discussions with your chicken little, "You're gonna die" dead weight? As for food chain... Where the hell do you think you are? There is no food chain. There's just you and me, and we just disagree. -- ----Because I can---- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ ------------------------ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ernest Christley wrote: Barnyard BOb -- wrote: Smart ass punk, Ernest Christley... If 50 years of flight, all my ratings and many thousands of hours make me a snot nosed ****er, where do you think that places you in the food chain? I was waiting for you to reply with that, Bob. Such a predictable fish. Thank you for the compliment, foolish one. Being a predictable 'fish' is what I have strived for all my life. Anything less would fit your adolescent 'suit'. Where the hell do you think you are? I'm here in RAH with 50 years of aviation experience and knowledge... attempting to keep you from killing yourself. There is no food chain. There's just you and me, and we just disagree. No ****, Sherlock. Shows that you're at greater risk than first thought. What kind of flowers do you like? Barnyard BOb -- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ernest Christley wrote: Smart ass punk, Ernest Christley... If 50 years of flight, all my ratings and many thousands of hours make me a snot nosed ****er, where do you think that places you in the food chain? I was waiting for you to reply with that, Bob. Such a predictable fish. Straight out of college, I started with a Fortune 100 that will rename nameless, except to say that they built business machnines internationally. All smart, green and full of vigor. Got put on the leading feature for the next release. Straight out of college with a Fortune 50 company, my son from one of the nation's most prestigious engineering colleges was an accident going somewhere to happen with his PPL. All it took was a moonless hazy night over the Everglades and he was well on his way to playing lawn dart, like Value Jet, in that swamp. As good fortune would have it, I was along for the ride. I made a difference. He would have been as dead as JFK, Jr and his passengers - without a doubt. His membership in MENSA was not about to save his youthful, cocky, brilliant, inexperienced ass. What that young man came away with in that one experience was respect. Something you have yet to learn. Gone is his contempt and cockiness. He now has his Commercial, Instrument, multi-engine, CFI rating, TWO Masters degrees and several patents with his Fortune 50 company....yet when it comes to GA flying , guess who he still consults? Your contempt is your worst enemy and it can kill you as surely as any brilliant surgeon that has gotten in over his head playing God in his Bonanza. Not to get to technical with something other than aviation, but this product depended upon a hash table as a central data repository. Who gives a rat's ass? All it appears to be worth here, is generating deadly contempt between your very green ears that will at some point get you snuffed! Wake up and get a clue!!!! A hash table is a data structure that is designed to make storing and finding sparse data fast and efficient. You take the data you want to store, 'hash' it to get a value, and use that value as an index into a table where the data will go. The central element here is speed. The system was limited by the speed of the hash table, and the speed of the hash table is limited in many ways by the efficiency of the hashing algorithm. And what does this have to do with surviving as test pilot in a one of a kind computer designed potential coffin? My team started to base our hash table off of one used in the product the we were extending. I took a close look at the hashing algorithm used, and it was based on an even earlier product. But the earlier product was a totally different beast that had only a cursory simularity to what we were working on. Did I mention that hashing algorithms should be application specific? For our application, the proposed solution was dog slow. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Christ, not only are you are as lame as they come in RAH... nobody is more full of themselves than you. All that to say, 50 years of sniffing pesticides while just barely managing to not get decapitated by a powerline doesn't necessarily mean that you have all the answers. In fact, it doesn't mean that you necessarily have ANY answers. From what you post here, I'd have to assume that it means little more than that you're a trained monkey who knows little more than how to handle his own stick. Talk about a 'predictable fish'. g You are the mutha of al trophies... and a spoiled brat, regardless of your chronological age. FWIW... I'm not here to post a resume. I will just say that my training extends far beyond crop dusting. However, your resume has made a buffoon of u and very much a 'fish' out of water, if you want to relate it to airplane training and experience. What do you add to the conversation? How have you advanced the state of aviation? Have you ever tried an experiment to improve an airplane's performance? Did you document what you did and what your results were? If you did experiment, how do you justify departing from the safe status quo, and more importantly how did you avoid becoming a statistic? If not why are you such a blow hard dragging down our discussions with your chicken little, "You're gonna die" dead weight? LIke I initially stated -- You're a smart ass and an accident going somewhere to happen. Unless you get very lucky like my son did.... you're a dead man walking. Mark my word. The last word.is yours. I don't suffer mouthy fools like you for long. Barnyard BOb - 50 years of flight |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Woof, Woof, was all the olddog could mutter. It seems he was comfortable on
the the porch even if the letters on the mat were well worn. But, he felt safe there watching as all the big dogs growled and snapped at each other in playful glee on the busy street. He knew his place, Woof, Woof OldCop "Barnyard BOb --" wrote in message ... Ernest Christley wrote: Smart ass punk, Ernest Christley... If 50 years of flight, all my ratings and many thousands of hours make me a snot nosed ****er, where do you think that places you in the food chain? I was waiting for you to reply with that, Bob. Such a predictable fish. Straight out of college, I started with a Fortune 100 that will rename nameless, except to say that they built business machnines internationally. All smart, green and full of vigor. Got put on the leading feature for the next release. Straight out of college with a Fortune 50 company, my son from one of the nation's most prestigious engineering colleges was an accident going somewhere to happen with his PPL. All it took was a moonless hazy night over the Everglades and he was well on his way to playing lawn dart, like Value Jet, in that swamp. As good fortune would have it, I was along for the ride. I made a difference. He would have been as dead as JFK, Jr and his passengers - without a doubt. His membership in MENSA was not about to save his youthful, cocky, brilliant, inexperienced ass. What that young man came away with in that one experience was respect. Something you have yet to learn. Gone is his contempt and cockiness. He now has his Commercial, Instrument, multi-engine, CFI rating, TWO Masters degrees and several patents with his Fortune 50 company....yet when it comes to GA flying , guess who he still consults? Your contempt is your worst enemy and it can kill you as surely as any brilliant surgeon that has gotten in over his head playing God in his Bonanza. Not to get to technical with something other than aviation, but this product depended upon a hash table as a central data repository. Who gives a rat's ass? All it appears to be worth here, is generating deadly contempt between your very green ears that will at some point get you snuffed! Wake up and get a clue!!!! A hash table is a data structure that is designed to make storing and finding sparse data fast and efficient. You take the data you want to store, 'hash' it to get a value, and use that value as an index into a table where the data will go. The central element here is speed. The system was limited by the speed of the hash table, and the speed of the hash table is limited in many ways by the efficiency of the hashing algorithm. And what does this have to do with surviving as test pilot in a one of a kind computer designed potential coffin? My team started to base our hash table off of one used in the product the we were extending. I took a close look at the hashing algorithm used, and it was based on an even earlier product. But the earlier product was a totally different beast that had only a cursory simularity to what we were working on. Did I mention that hashing algorithms should be application specific? For our application, the proposed solution was dog slow. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Christ, not only are you are as lame as they come in RAH... nobody is more full of themselves than you. All that to say, 50 years of sniffing pesticides while just barely managing to not get decapitated by a powerline doesn't necessarily mean that you have all the answers. In fact, it doesn't mean that you necessarily have ANY answers. From what you post here, I'd have to assume that it means little more than that you're a trained monkey who knows little more than how to handle his own stick. Talk about a 'predictable fish'. g You are the mutha of al trophies... and a spoiled brat, regardless of your chronological age. FWIW... I'm not here to post a resume. I will just say that my training extends far beyond crop dusting. However, your resume has made a buffoon of u and very much a 'fish' out of water, if you want to relate it to airplane training and experience. What do you add to the conversation? How have you advanced the state of aviation? Have you ever tried an experiment to improve an airplane's performance? Did you document what you did and what your results were? If you did experiment, how do you justify departing from the safe status quo, and more importantly how did you avoid becoming a statistic? If not why are you such a blow hard dragging down our discussions with your chicken little, "You're gonna die" dead weight? LIke I initially stated -- You're a smart ass and an accident going somewhere to happen. Unless you get very lucky like my son did.... you're a dead man walking. Mark my word. The last word.is yours. I don't suffer mouthy fools like you for long. Barnyard BOb - 50 years of flight |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OldCop" wrote
Woof, Woof, was all the olddog could mutter. It seems he was comfortable on the the porch even if the letters on the mat were well worn. But, he felt safe there watching as all the big dogs growled and snapped at each other in playful glee on the busy street. He knew his place, Woof, Woof OldCop Pac sez: Major, you would have made a great cargo dog. :-) Good luck on you project. pacplyer |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Pac, I almost choose that direction. I used to go along on some
frieght trips years ago, hauling kidneys for transplants and checks to ATL in a 310. I was along for the ride and experience. The guy I used to be facinated with flew either a Beech 18 or Loadstar into SDF with his black lab as his copilot. I think he had pt6's on it if my memory serves me correct. I thought that was kind of cool. Oh well, my life has turned out pretty well sticking with the cop shop but I am really tired of it after 29 years. My son just graduated from Purdue and is instructing at JVY so I might get off my rusty dusty and do it yet, become a freight dog. I enjoy your post, keep your sense of humor, Dirtyside Down OldCop "pac plyer" wrote in message om... "OldCop" wrote Woof, Woof, was all the olddog could mutter. It seems he was comfortable on the the porch even if the letters on the mat were well worn. But, he felt safe there watching as all the big dogs growled and snapped at each other in playful glee on the busy street. He knew his place, Woof, Woof OldCop Pac sez: Major, you would have made a great cargo dog. :-) Good luck on you project. pacplyer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|