![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell wrote:
Mark James Boyd wrote: Here's a wierd idea: Get longer wings. If the wings hit an updraft, they will go up, and flex, but the fuselage won't go up right away, kind of a "shock absorber." Then the wings will reflex, giving extra thrust, and dissipating the G's. A few oscillations later and you'll feel real queasy, but you'll have more glide and less G's. Better all around, right? OK, a bit off thread, but has anyone modeled this (dynamic) interaction? Sure sure, we know about best glide, but what about the effect of long wings flapping like a seagull in turbulence? You don't have to go to long wings to enjoy this effect, but just buy an ASW20 ("A" or C model, though the B was relatively flexible, too)! Or a Pegase of the first series, which had soft wings. This is indeed comfortable in gusty air. -- Michel TALON |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Michel Talon wrote: Or a Pegase of the first series, which had soft wings. This is indeed comfortable in gusty air. -- Michel TALON While physically comfortble, I did not find it comforting. In strong turbulence, whenever I looked out at the Pegasus' wings flapping around, I felt compelled to review the bailout procedure. Eventually, I stopped looking. These flexible wings can also be a problem on field landings. If they flex down and catch on a furrow, or in the crop, you are in for a wild ride. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|