![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just a few thoughts for you:
I've noticed some people telling you that 20 years (or even 15) is too much, and quoting a bunch of stuff and scary examples. Speaking as someone who has 600+ parachute jumps, including 8 emergency activations (three of them on emergency parachutes greater than 20 years old and two more on emergency parachutes more than 15 years old) and multiple intentional single-parachute jumps (several on a parachute greater than 20 years old) and put put well over 100 first jump students (most of them on reserves over 20 years old) I can only say that this is the worst load of FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) that I've seen on this newsgroup in a while. There is no life limit on parachutes on the US. Period, end of story, not a gray area, not debatable. As long as the parachute passes inspection, it is legal and safe to use. Life limits are used in aviation when there is no effective non-destructive way to inspect a component to assure it still meets standards. There are NO parts of a parachute that can't be effectively inspected when it is being repacked, thus there is no reason whatsoever for life limits. It's really that simple. People who understand and routinely use and pack parachutes (skydivers) also understand this, and have no qualms about the age of a reserve (or main) parachute that has been inspected. They also understand that the number of times the parachute is packed and/or jumped does cause wear. This wear is visible and inspectable. The factory has an interest in limiting liability and making older product go away. A dealer has an interest in selling new product. Therefore, impartial opinions are not to be had from either. The acid mesh problem is an ancient bugaboo. Once upon a time it was a real issue. An AD was issued (AD's are issued on parachutes just like they are on aircraft), some parachutes were tested, and the problem went away. Manufacturers now have improved QC procedures so it is no longer an issue. Round personnel parachutes are old technology. There has been no substantial improvement in that technology in decades. What's manufactured today is barely distinguishable from what was manufactured in 1980, changes to TSO notwithstanding. Here is my advice to you: Stay away from riggers who don't routinely jump - they are bad news. Ideally, find a rigger who BASE jumps - they understand what's really important when making a single canopy jump. Go to your local drop zone. Not some fancy commercial operation with turbine aircraft and tandems, but something more local and down home. Talk to the jumpers who jump old gear, and find out who their rigger is. Have him inspect and repack the parachute. If he considers it sound, sell it - and give his name to the buyer. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Emergency Parachute questions | Jay Moreland | Aerobatics | 14 | December 3rd 04 05:46 PM |
Parachute safety | Duane Eisenbeiss | Soaring | 0 | May 15th 04 08:13 PM |
Cirrus BRS deployments - Alan Klapmeier's comments on NPR | Dan Luke | Piloting | 67 | April 25th 04 04:31 PM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |