![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Johnstone writes
: Spot on Ian. The rules for the Air Cadets in the UK, RAF rules, prohibit intentional spinning below 2500ft in a glider. If you are still spinning you abandon at this height How many gliders will not recover from a spin with 2,500' to spare? Nobody living can answer that question But by far the greater weight of living people can demonstrate that the glider will recover from a spin if you have 2500' to spare. In my case, for example, all of my own spin training and personal practice has been done from a height somewhat less than this. What are the injury rates for parachute jumps from gliders? How many people survive spinning in? How many recorded instances are there of gliders spinning in from 2500' ? In how many of those cases was there absolutely no suggestion that something else had put the glider into an untenable position and so prevented recovery? Although I fully appreciate ill-founded wisdom of initiating a low spin even for training purposes, surely nobody would argue that demonstration of spinning and tuition and practice in recovering from such an event isn't a vital part of ab-inito training? Yet my own ab-inito training was from a winch site across a British winter, so the vast majority of my training flights never exceeded 2000' agl, and they only made that on an especially good day. All of my spin practice occurred between 1000' and 1600'. And still does, for the most part. I just can't imagine abandoning a glider at 2500' because of a spin, at least not without other contributing factors. Perhaps if I'd initiated the spin at such a height that I'd had a few rotations of being unable to recover by that stage and I was convinced that further attempts to recover would be futile? But I'd be jumping on the assumption that the glider was broke, not because it was spinning. -- Bill Gribble /---------------------------------------\ | http://www.ingenuitytest.co.uk | | http://www.cotswoldgliding.co.uk | | http://www.scapegoatsanon.demon.co.uk | \---------------------------------------/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | April 29th 04 03:08 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |