![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 11:00 18 January 2005, Ian Johnston wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:41:29 UTC, Don Johnstone wrote: : Spot on Ian. The rules for the Air Cadets in the UK, : RAF rules, prohibit intentional spinning below 2500ft : in a glider. If you are still spinning you abandon : at this height How many gliders will not recover from a spin with 2,500' to spare? What are the injury rates for parachute jumps from gliders? Ian -- I'm guessing that this 2500ft rule has nothing to do with glider spin recovery and altitude loss. It seems more logical that it is the altitude needed to deploy canopy, get out, have the chute open and slow down the not yet dead weight of the pilot. The US rule is that the spin must be stopped above 1500ft. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | April 29th 04 03:08 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |