A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Real-world IFR currency



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 15th 05, 05:03 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Victor J. Osborne, Jr. wrote:
The regs say no. That's why many use hoods and safety pilots to keep
current.


Sure wish you'd include a little context from the posting you are replying to so
I'd have some idea what you are talking about. You can't depend on people seeing
the same sequence of postings that you see, and just backing up one posting. The
order of arrival of postings is server-dependent. Thanks.
  #2  
Old February 15th 05, 07:29 PM
Ron Garret
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article 1108486843.338708@sj-nntpcache-5, Dave Butler
wrote:

Victor J. Osborne, Jr. wrote:
The regs say no. That's why many use hoods and safety pilots to keep
current.


Sure wish you'd include a little context from the posting you are replying to
so
I'd have some idea what you are talking about. You can't depend on people
seeing
the same sequence of postings that you see, and just backing up one posting.
The
order of arrival of postings is server-dependent. Thanks.


The original question was: under what circumstances can an approach be
logged for the purposes of maintaining IFR currency? Obviously if
you're under the hood with a safety pilot or in hard IMC to minimums you
can log it, and if you're in VMC without a hood you can't. But where is
the line?

rg
  #3  
Old February 15th 05, 07:37 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There is no requirement to fly an approach "in hard IMC to minimums".

The last thing I saw published by tthe FAA was that the approach had merely
to be "initiated" in IMC to be loggable.


"Ron Garret" wrote in message
...
In article 1108486843.338708@sj-nntpcache-5, Dave Butler
wrote:

Victor J. Osborne, Jr. wrote:
The regs say no. That's why many use hoods and safety pilots to keep
current.


Sure wish you'd include a little context from the posting you are

replying to
so
I'd have some idea what you are talking about. You can't depend on

people
seeing
the same sequence of postings that you see, and just backing up one

posting.
The
order of arrival of postings is server-dependent. Thanks.


The original question was: under what circumstances can an approach be
logged for the purposes of maintaining IFR currency? Obviously if
you're under the hood with a safety pilot or in hard IMC to minimums you
can log it, and if you're in VMC without a hood you can't. But where is
the line?

rg



  #4  
Old February 15th 05, 09:24 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The last thing I saw published by tthe FAA was that the approach had merely
to be "initiated" in IMC to be loggable.


The last thing I saw (the FAQ) indicated that it had to be to minimus
(though I suppose any class of minimums would do). Where did you read
from the FAA that initiating an approach in IMC, and continuing
visually, is sufficient for legal purposes?

Jose
  #5  
Old February 15th 05, 09:38 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:24:13 GMT, Jose
wrote:

The last thing I saw published by tthe FAA was that the approach had merely
to be "initiated" in IMC to be loggable.


The last thing I saw (the FAQ) indicated that it had to be to minimus
(though I suppose any class of minimums would do). Where did you read
from the FAA that initiating an approach in IMC, and continuing
visually, is sufficient for legal purposes?

Jose



What exactly is "the FAQ"?

I read it in a response to a question in the FAANews, a FAA
publication which may or may not still be in existence.

It was a while ago, but I have never read anything in the interim to
contradict that statement.
  #7  
Old February 15th 05, 10:21 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That would be the FAAviation News, still around, apparently.

Do you recall what issue it is? Online it only goes back to 2000 or so.

What exactly is "the FAQ"?


The FAA part 61 Faqs are located here (as a Word document):

http://www.firstgov.gov/fgsearch/res...cs/pt61FAQ.doc

The question about logging instrument approaches is answered on page
123, or you can search for the string:

QUESTION: As far as logging an approach in actual

Jose


  #8  
Old February 16th 05, 12:08 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron Garret" wrote in message
...

The original question was: under what circumstances can an approach be
logged for the purposes of maintaining IFR currency? Obviously if
you're under the hood with a safety pilot or in hard IMC to minimums you
can log it, and if you're in VMC without a hood you can't. But where is
the line?


I'd log the approaches that were necessary to complete the flight. If
there's solid cloud at or below the MIA/MVA an approach is necessary to
reach the destination, even if the field is VMC.


  #9  
Old February 16th 05, 12:23 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'd agree. This pretty much follows the "FAAviation News" rule.

If you initiate an approach in IMC, it's loggable.

Once I pass the IAF, or receive the first approach vector, if I am
IMC, it gets logged.


On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:08:10 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


"Ron Garret" wrote in message
...

The original question was: under what circumstances can an approach be
logged for the purposes of maintaining IFR currency? Obviously if
you're under the hood with a safety pilot or in hard IMC to minimums you
can log it, and if you're in VMC without a hood you can't. But where is
the line?


I'd log the approaches that were necessary to complete the flight. If
there's solid cloud at or below the MIA/MVA an approach is necessary to
reach the destination, even if the field is VMC.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP vvcd Home Built 0 September 22nd 04 07:16 PM
God Honest Naval Aviation 2 July 24th 03 04:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.