![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Victor J. Osborne, Jr. wrote:
The regs say no. That's why many use hoods and safety pilots to keep current. Sure wish you'd include a little context from the posting you are replying to so I'd have some idea what you are talking about. You can't depend on people seeing the same sequence of postings that you see, and just backing up one posting. The order of arrival of postings is server-dependent. Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 1108486843.338708@sj-nntpcache-5, Dave Butler
wrote: Victor J. Osborne, Jr. wrote: The regs say no. That's why many use hoods and safety pilots to keep current. Sure wish you'd include a little context from the posting you are replying to so I'd have some idea what you are talking about. You can't depend on people seeing the same sequence of postings that you see, and just backing up one posting. The order of arrival of postings is server-dependent. Thanks. The original question was: under what circumstances can an approach be logged for the purposes of maintaining IFR currency? Obviously if you're under the hood with a safety pilot or in hard IMC to minimums you can log it, and if you're in VMC without a hood you can't. But where is the line? rg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is no requirement to fly an approach "in hard IMC to minimums".
The last thing I saw published by tthe FAA was that the approach had merely to be "initiated" in IMC to be loggable. "Ron Garret" wrote in message ... In article 1108486843.338708@sj-nntpcache-5, Dave Butler wrote: Victor J. Osborne, Jr. wrote: The regs say no. That's why many use hoods and safety pilots to keep current. Sure wish you'd include a little context from the posting you are replying to so I'd have some idea what you are talking about. You can't depend on people seeing the same sequence of postings that you see, and just backing up one posting. The order of arrival of postings is server-dependent. Thanks. The original question was: under what circumstances can an approach be logged for the purposes of maintaining IFR currency? Obviously if you're under the hood with a safety pilot or in hard IMC to minimums you can log it, and if you're in VMC without a hood you can't. But where is the line? rg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The last thing I saw published by tthe FAA was that the approach had merely
to be "initiated" in IMC to be loggable. The last thing I saw (the FAQ) indicated that it had to be to minimus (though I suppose any class of minimums would do). Where did you read from the FAA that initiating an approach in IMC, and continuing visually, is sufficient for legal purposes? Jose |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:24:13 GMT, Jose
wrote: The last thing I saw published by tthe FAA was that the approach had merely to be "initiated" in IMC to be loggable. The last thing I saw (the FAQ) indicated that it had to be to minimus (though I suppose any class of minimums would do). Where did you read from the FAA that initiating an approach in IMC, and continuing visually, is sufficient for legal purposes? Jose What exactly is "the FAQ"? I read it in a response to a question in the FAANews, a FAA publication which may or may not still be in existence. It was a while ago, but I have never read anything in the interim to contradict that statement. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That would be the FAAviation News, still around, apparently.
Do you recall what issue it is? Online it only goes back to 2000 or so. What exactly is "the FAQ"? The FAA part 61 Faqs are located here (as a Word document): http://www.firstgov.gov/fgsearch/res...cs/pt61FAQ.doc The question about logging instrument approaches is answered on page 123, or you can search for the string: QUESTION: As far as logging an approach in actual Jose |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Garret" wrote in message ... The original question was: under what circumstances can an approach be logged for the purposes of maintaining IFR currency? Obviously if you're under the hood with a safety pilot or in hard IMC to minimums you can log it, and if you're in VMC without a hood you can't. But where is the line? I'd log the approaches that were necessary to complete the flight. If there's solid cloud at or below the MIA/MVA an approach is necessary to reach the destination, even if the field is VMC. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd agree. This pretty much follows the "FAAviation News" rule.
If you initiate an approach in IMC, it's loggable. Once I pass the IAF, or receive the first approach vector, if I am IMC, it gets logged. On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:08:10 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "Ron Garret" wrote in message ... The original question was: under what circumstances can an approach be logged for the purposes of maintaining IFR currency? Obviously if you're under the hood with a safety pilot or in hard IMC to minimums you can log it, and if you're in VMC without a hood you can't. But where is the line? I'd log the approaches that were necessary to complete the flight. If there's solid cloud at or below the MIA/MVA an approach is necessary to reach the destination, even if the field is VMC. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's what I do and think it is supported by the regs. I don't have anyone
in the right seat telling me otherwise. Victor J. (Jim) Osborne, Jr. "Ron Garret" The original question was: under what circumstances can an approach be logged for the purposes of maintaining IFR currency? Obviously if you're under the hood with a safety pilot or in hard IMC to minimums you can log it, and if you're in VMC without a hood you can't. But where is the line? I'd log the approaches that were necessary to complete the flight. If there's solid cloud at or below the MIA/MVA an approach is necessary to reach the destination, even if the field is VMC. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Home Built | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:16 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |