![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired wrote:
Can't beat the "6 Million Dollar Man" series for really low budget effects. Ever notice no matter what aircraft he was flying they would always show B-52 gear retracting. I must say I was disappointed by the flying scenes in "The Aviator" -- not enough of them, and the XF-11 and Spruce Goose never looked like anything other than Photoshop-generated images :-( And what about the scene where Howard and someone are walking off, trying to think what kind of wood to build it out of... I mean, it's not like spruce hadn't been a standard aircraft construction material for almost 40 years at that point. Sheesh, in a movie about an aviation legend, they could at least make an effort to get the aviation facts straight. Frank (and wasn't that 737 I saw landing in 1963 in "Ray"?) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank van der Hulst" wrote And what about the scene where Howard and someone are walking off, trying to think what kind of wood to build it out of... I mean, it's not like spruce hadn't been a standard aircraft construction material for almost 40 years at that point. You do realize that there is very little spruce in the spruce goose, don't you? -- Jim in NC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I must say I was disappointed by the flying scenes in "The Aviator" --
not enough of them, and the XF-11 and Spruce Goose never looked like anything other than Photoshop-generated images :-( Actually, those were both very large R/C models, according to Air & Space magazine. We're talking in the hundreds of pounds. (And the Spruce Goose model was supposedly ELECTRIC powered, which I thought was interesting...) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck opined
I must say I was disappointed by the flying scenes in "The Aviator" -- not enough of them, and the XF-11 and Spruce Goose never looked like anything other than Photoshop-generated images :-( Actually, those were both very large R/C models, according to Air & Space magazine. We're talking in the hundreds of pounds. (And the Spruce Goose model was supposedly ELECTRIC powered, which I thought was interesting...) Given Lithium Polymer batteries, electric is becoming the power of choice for scale aircraft. Look through some of last years RC mags, there is a Chinese AWACs aircraft in many of them. Interesting plane. Based on a Soviet copy of a US B-29. Even has a rotating radome. -ash Cthulhu in 2005! Why wait for nature? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote Actually, those were both very large R/C models, according to Air & Space magazine. We're talking in the hundreds of pounds. (And the Spruce Goose model was supposedly ELECTRIC powered, which I thought was interesting...) -- Jay Honeck Can you imagine trying to start 8 engines, and keep them running? Electric makes multi's much easier. I often wonder if the Spruce Goose was capable of flying out of ground effect, with the engines that were on it. Has anyone ever done a modern aero analysis on it? -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Who can identify this tube frame aircraft fuselage? | Rob de Bie | Home Built | 5 | January 13th 05 09:45 PM |
Recovering fuselage | Ed Haywood | Home Built | 1 | March 12th 04 03:45 AM |
DC-3 wings and fuselage twisted in a storm but landed safely. | Ron | Military Aviation | 0 | October 9th 03 09:23 PM |
DC-3 wings and fuselage twisted in a storm but landed safely. | Ron | Piloting | 0 | October 9th 03 09:11 PM |
Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 09:14 AM |