![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Patterson" wrote in message ... Jimbob wrote: Speculation: If this really takes off and the industry starts making some money, could the FAA be pressured to expand speeds, weight limits and # of seats. Include retracts? Maybe incorporate all non-commercial A/C operations under the LSA rule? It may be far fetched, but not outside the realm of possibility. Not a chance. The only way the FAA was convinced to relax the requirement for a medical certificate was to convince the powers that be that an LSA can't do very much damage when the pilot has a heart attack. Expand the size or speed of those planes, and they'll start requiring medicals for that class. Gotta agree. Increase the plane capabilities and you increase the impact on others in the system and on the ground. If you are going to fly over two nautical miles per minute, you likely need to learn about the airspace rules and get your PPL anyway. You gotta draw the line somewhere. If LSA is successful in letting more members into the club, I would hope we would look into rewriting a lot of the mishmash we now have as regulations to make things simpler. The simpler the regulations, the more time we can devote to training real safety issues. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dude wrote: If LSA is successful in letting more members into the club, I would hope we would look into rewriting a lot of the mishmash we now have as regulations to make things simpler. The simpler the regulations, the more time we can devote to training real safety issues. I sincerely hope that the next 20 years will provide the statistical ammunition to overturn the requirement for third-class medical certificates. My personal belief is that there will be no significant difference in the number of accidents caused by medical problems in the SP and PP/RP categories. It probably won't matter to me by that time, though. George Patterson He who tries to carry a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Patterson" wrote in message ... I sincerely hope that the next 20 years will provide the statistical ammunition to overturn the requirement for third-class medical certificates. My personal belief is that there will be no significant difference in the number of accidents caused by medical problems in the SP and PP/RP categories. This is the real hope. If you want to fly a Bonanza, getting a PPL should be the least of your concerns. Of course, 20 years ago you couldn't get a special issuance for any number of things that are routine now, and so long as we don't do something stupid to the pharmaceutical/healthcare industries, they will probably find cures for an awful lot of qhat is now disqualifying. -cwk. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |