![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce
I have used a V1000 attached to the TE probe on the PW-6 for three years -- perfectly satisfied. -- Charles Yeates Swidnik PW-6U & PW-5 http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/yeatesc/world.html Bruce wrote: Time to start a new debate. How do pressure transducer varios compare to traditional mechanical varios in club use? Can you mix and match a capacity vario and a pressure transducer vario on a single TE probe? Do students - please note NOT experienced pilots - find the lcd display units easy to use, or are moving needle varios better (I know we should be using the audio - but for the times when we want to see the climb performance the question is still valid) We are looking at replacing some vintage mechanical varios, and have some debate about the advisability of needing electrical power for the vario and the relative benefits of the Borgelt B40 and the Tasman V1000, and of course another set of Winter mechanicals... Being a computer type, I am biased towards the "no moving parts" V1000. So - any views? Bruce |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It's probably good to avoid sharing pressure transducer varios with others that use capacity flasks as these introduce airflow into the TE plumbing system that can degrade accuracy. My main vario is a Borgelt B 50 and I replaced my excellent Sage mechanical vario with a Borgelt B 40. I find it hard to thermal accurately without an audio vario and switched mainly for this reason. I can't say that I noticed any major changes in the B 50 when I removed the Sage and its flask, though. I can't think of any good reason to keep a mechanical or flask-driven vario with the inexpensive pressure units around, especially those like the B 40 that have an internal battery. I'm all for no moving parts, but how do you make sound without a diaphragm? Mike ASW 20 WA |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In my old ship, a 19B, I had a Sage and a LX 1600. I recall a
suggestion, source of which I don't recall, about placing the T as far back as possible. This seemed to work; at least the correlation between both instruments was good. In the new ship, we are using a LX7K and a B40. Both pressure transducers and I like the idea of having the back-up instrument having the audio. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opinions on Cessna 340, 414 and 421 | john szpara | Owning | 55 | April 2nd 04 09:08 PM |
Opinions wanted | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 65 | January 21st 04 04:15 AM |
OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | January 7th 04 10:43 PM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Owning | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Piloting | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |