A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Night flying in the mountians in a cessna 150,



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 26th 05, 06:24 PM
Ron Garret
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:15:41 -0800, Ron Garret
wrote:

Not only are you wrong, but you are clearly, demonstrably, and
self-evidently wrong. If you don't believe me, you can actually *do*
this experiment. Don't play the lottery or go flying until your engine
fails. Get a die. Pretend that rolling a six means your engine has
failed. Now ask yourself: are you more likely to roll a six if you roll
it once, or if you roll it 100 times? Clearly if you roll it once your
chances are one in six, and if you roll it 100 times the chances of
rolling AT LEAST ONE SIX in those hundred trials is very close to 1.
(0.99999998792532652 to be precise).



Let's look at this another way.

Let's say the probability of an engine failure is 1 every 10,000
hours.

Let's assume that I declare that I intend to fly 10,000 hours in my
lifetime. We would probably agree that my chances of an engine
failure in my lifetime approximates 1. A serious betting man would
not bet against my chances of having a failure.

Now let's say my life is half over, and I've flown 5000 hours without
having had my failure. (a perfectly acceptable supposition).

Now I am looking at the rest of my life, wherein I will fly the
additional 5000, hours. The probability of a failure is still 1 every
10,000 hours (nothing has changed with the equipment, etc., to change
the probability)

Therefore, now the chances of having an engine failure during the rest
of my life has DECREASED.


That's right. Just as if you get half-way through your hundred rolls of
the dice without rolling a six, your chances of rolling a six in your
remaining rolls are now less than they were when you started. In the
extreme, if you get through 99 rolls without rolling a six, your chances
of rolling a six on your last roll are just one in six. And if you get
through all 100 rolls without rolling a six your chances of rolling a
six from then on are zero, just as they would have been if you'd never
started rolling/flying to begin with.

Simply put, it's how much flying time you got in front of you, not
behind you, that determines your likelihood of experienceng a failure.


Obviously.

rg
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Routine Aviation Career Guy Alcala Military Aviation 0 September 26th 04 12:33 AM
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? Cub Driver Military Aviation 106 May 12th 04 07:18 AM
Night Flying Tips BoDEAN Piloting 7 May 4th 04 03:22 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
Headlight for night flying Paul Tomblin Piloting 22 September 27th 03 09:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.