A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Night flying in the mountians in a cessna 150,



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 26th 05, 06:48 PM
Ron Garret
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:25:40 -0800, Ron Garret
wrote:

no, I think his point is that you are more likely to have an engine
failure tomorrow if you have flown 10,000 hours than if you have flown
10 hours.


No, that is NOT the point I was making. (And if you thought it was,
would you please point out what I wrote that made you think so? I
obviously need to hone my pedagogy.)



rg


This is what made me think so:


"That's true, but the longer you fly (or play the lottery) the closer
your probability of experiencing an engine failure (or a lottery win)
some time your career approaches 1.

Of course, you might have to fly/play for a *very* long time before
that
probability actually gets close to 1, but sooner or later it will be 1
to any desired degree of accuracy. So the statement "fly long enough
and
you will experience an engine failure" is pretty close to being true.
The question is how long is "long enough."

rg"


Well, gee, you and Peter are both making it challenging to frame
respectful responses here. You wrote:

"I think his point is that you are more likely to have an engine failure
tomorrow..."

but that is clearly not what I said. What I said was that you are more
likely to have an engine failure "SOME TIME IN YOUR CAREER". Not
"tomorrow". Big difference.

It's as if I said, "The sky is blue" and you responded "I think the
point he was trying to make is that the sky is green." Well, you're
right, the sky isn't green. But I never said that it was.

Let me try this again:

1. The probability of experiencing an engine failure (or any other
improbable event for that matter) AT SOME POINT IN YOUR FLYING CAREER
goes up the more you fly. It goes up monotonically but nonlinearly
according to the formula 1-(1-P)^N, which asymptotically approaches 1 as
N gets large.

2. The probability of experiencing an engine failure (or any other
improbable event) on any one particular flight does NOT depend on how
often you fly. (This is the point that I think you and Peter have been
trying to make, and with which I have never disagreed.)

3. The sky is BLUE (except lately in southern California).

rg
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? Cub Driver Military Aviation 106 May 12th 04 07:18 AM
Night Flying Tips BoDEAN Piloting 7 May 4th 04 03:22 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! Enea Grande Products 1 November 4th 03 12:57 AM
Headlight for night flying Paul Tomblin Piloting 22 September 27th 03 09:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.