A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nice skyline article



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 27th 05, 02:05 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I read the article and I don't agree with it. I think it's much
better to
fly the minimum sink airspeed for the bank angle. Lets do the math.


Bill Daniels


With a little reflection it is *obvious* that it cannot be optimal to
fly a given radius circle at a certain bank angle and airspeed if there
is a different combination of airspeed and bank angle giving a lower
sink rate for that radius of circle. If there is a different
combination yielding the *same radius* and *lower sink rate* then all
the higher sink rate combinations for that radius are not optimal.

If we are optimized then we are at the minimum sink rate for the circle
radius we are flying - period.

Judah's beautiful graphs and Reichman's 70's vintage "Cross Country"
both make it clear that the optimum will be found somewhat on the back
side of minimum sink speed for the optimal bank angle. Severe mushing
descent speed and sub-minimum controllable airspeed as potential
solutions are exagerated straw men.

But I did not understand from Reichman that the optimal speed actually
decreases initially with increasing bank angle/decreasing radius. So
this feature of the data in my ASW-20C pilot's manual was always a bit
of a mystery to me.

Thanks to Judah for graphing optimal speed versus radius directly for
several types, making the situation clear.

How to find the optimal radius though! Wouldn't it be a wonderfully
convenient coincidence if at the optimal radius the overbanking
tendency of the glider was exactly balanced by the lift gradient trying
to unroll the glider? Would this work out for some particular span? I
could probably notice when the stick was in the center, and it would
sure be nice to know I was flying right. Someone please do the math
and let me know.

Jonathan

  #2  
Old February 27th 05, 03:29 PM
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
oups.com...
I read the article and I don't agree with it. I think it's much

better to
fly the minimum sink airspeed for the bank angle. Lets do the math.


Bill Daniels


With a little reflection it is *obvious* that it cannot be optimal to
fly a given radius circle at a certain bank angle and airspeed if there
is a different combination of airspeed and bank angle giving a lower
sink rate for that radius of circle. If there is a different
combination yielding the *same radius* and *lower sink rate* then all
the higher sink rate combinations for that radius are not optimal.

If we are optimized then we are at the minimum sink rate for the circle
radius we are flying - period.

Judah's beautiful graphs and Reichman's 70's vintage "Cross Country"
both make it clear that the optimum will be found somewhat on the back
side of minimum sink speed for the optimal bank angle. Severe mushing
descent speed and sub-minimum controllable airspeed as potential
solutions are exagerated straw men.

But I did not understand from Reichman that the optimal speed actually
decreases initially with increasing bank angle/decreasing radius. So
this feature of the data in my ASW-20C pilot's manual was always a bit
of a mystery to me.

Thanks to Judah for graphing optimal speed versus radius directly for
several types, making the situation clear.

How to find the optimal radius though! Wouldn't it be a wonderfully
convenient coincidence if at the optimal radius the overbanking
tendency of the glider was exactly balanced by the lift gradient trying
to unroll the glider? Would this work out for some particular span? I
could probably notice when the stick was in the center, and it would
sure be nice to know I was flying right. Someone please do the math
and let me know.

Jonathan


The original issue was that gains could be achieved by reducing bank angle
and flying slower. More specifically, that the same radius could be
achieved at a lower sink at a lower bank and speed.

My point is that any gains are very, very small and likely to place the
pilot at risk of a stall/spin in rough air. (If I know a pilot is
attempting this, I won't be flying under him in a gaggle.)

All I'm saying is that small reductions in airspeed below min sink have
little effect on turn radii. Bank angle has a far larger effect. I've done
the math and plotted the results to scale to prove it to myself. A small
turn radius is good but it's best achieved with bank not reductions in
airspeed below min sink.

Accurate centering has a much greater effect on average climb rate than a
tiny reduction in turn radius achieved by a small reduction in airspeed.
Minimum sink is a solid airspeed that provides good control authority for
centering the thermal and is a much better bet for most pilots.

Almost any pilot will benefit more by practicing a "standard" 45 degree bank
at minimum sink airspeed for that bank angle than by reaching for a few feet
reduction in turn radius by flying slower.

Bill Daniels

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weather Article In EAA Sport Pilot Mag Icebound Piloting 4 December 19th 04 12:13 PM
News Article Promotes Soaring Burt Compton Soaring 4 December 11th 04 08:48 PM
Looking for (recent, I believe) article about Va Andrew Gideon Piloting 4 October 29th 04 03:06 PM
Tiedown Stakes (Article in SportAv.) Jim Weir Piloting 18 April 23rd 04 07:26 AM
An Article on Unrecoverable Spins Dave Swartz Aerobatics 0 August 16th 03 06:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.