A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Night flying in the mountians in a cessna 150,



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 27th 05, 11:23 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ron Garret" wrote in message
...
No, your premise is wrong. I have in fact already given you two
examples (and I have even pointed this out to you once already).


Really? I must have missed those posts. I don't recall you telling me the
name of anyone using the risk analysis you propose. But again, I am more
than happy to be corrected. Please feel free to point the posts out to
me...I will happily concede your point. Most convenient for me would be a
link to the Google Groups record of the post, but a Message-ID would be
fine.

Pete


  #2  
Old February 28th 05, 01:06 AM
Ron Garret
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Peter Duniho" wrote:

"Ron Garret" wrote in message
...
No, your premise is wrong. I have in fact already given you two
examples (and I have even pointed this out to you once already).


Really? I must have missed those posts.


You couldn't have missed them all because you responded to some of them.
But Google is your friend if you want to go back and review.

I don't recall you telling me the
name of anyone using the risk analysis you propose.


Another straw man. I didn't tell you their names.

But again, I am more than happy to be corrected.


Once again (because we've trod this ground before too) I doubt that very
much. I have already corrected you on half a dozen points (including
this one) and you don't seem particularly happy about it.

Please feel free to point the posts out to
me...I will happily concede your point.


I don't really care if you concede the point or not, so I'm afraid you
will have to do your own homework.

rg
  #3  
Old February 28th 05, 01:33 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ron Garret" wrote in message
...
Another straw man. I didn't tell you their names.


Then you didn't provide the information I requested, and which would support
your claims.

But again, I am more than happy to be corrected.


Once again (because we've trod this ground before too) I doubt that very
much.


Do not pretend to know what I will or will not do. You clearly have no
idea.

I have already corrected you on half a dozen points (including
this one) and you don't seem particularly happy about it.


You have not made a single supportable correction. If you had, there are a
dozen folks in this newsgroup who would be overjoyed to hop on the bandwagon
of proving me wrong. That's just how Usenet is. The utter lack of support
for your claims is evidence enough of their fallacy.

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? Cub Driver Military Aviation 106 May 12th 04 07:18 AM
Night Flying Tips BoDEAN Piloting 7 May 4th 04 03:22 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! Enea Grande Products 1 November 4th 03 12:57 AM
Headlight for night flying Paul Tomblin Piloting 22 September 27th 03 09:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.