![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:14:25 GMT, "Julian Scarfe"
wrote in :: "Larry Dighera" wrote in message news ![]() While your statement above is generally accurate, it's not absolutely true (as was pointed out to me by a glider pilot in e-mail). Here's some empirical evidence of L/D changing with a change in weight (note the right hand polar graph under 'Technical data'): http://www.dianasailplanes.com/szd55.html The data there indicates an L/D of 51 at higher weights, 49 at lower (about 50%). That seems consistent with the idea that at higher Reynolds numbers (in effect, higher speeds) the skin friction drag coefficient reduces a little. Reynolds number: http://aerodyn.org/Frames/1flight.html Given the "clean" design of the glider, the increase in parasitic drag at higher speeds is probably insignificant compared to the "skin friction drag" reduction. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
... Given the "clean" design of the glider, the increase in parasitic drag at higher speeds is probably insignificant compared to the "skin friction drag" reduction. I think so. Words for drag vary, and I've always used parasite drag to include skin friction, but I think we mean the same thing. For a laminar boundary layer, skin friction is proportional to Re^-0.5, and for a turbulent boundary layer to Re^-0.2. If skin friction drag is about 2/3 of the total parasite drag (by which I mean skin friction + form drag), which in turn is 1/2 the total drag at best glide, that would suggest that the L/D should improve by between 1/15 and 1/6 of the increase in speed. The data you quoted, with a 50% speed difference for a 2-3% difference in L/D suggest something like the 1/15 expected of a turbulent boundary layer. Julian |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
Given the "clean" design of the glider, the increase in parasitic drag at higher speeds is probably insignificant compared to the "skin friction drag" reduction. But given that the original poster was most probably talking of airplanes with noisemakers, I suspect that for him, best glide gets dramatically worse at higher speeds. As I always say: Airplanes don't *need* airbrakes because the whole plane *is* just one huge airbrake. Stefan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
more radial fans like fw190? | jt | Military Aviation | 51 | August 28th 04 04:22 AM |
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 12:18 PM |
Buying an L-2 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 13 | May 25th 04 04:03 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Angle of climb at Vx and glide angle when "overweight": five questions | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 16 | November 29th 03 10:01 PM |