![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm flabbergasted at how many of these comments refer to not following
the radio procedures. Yes the Citation should have called, but most important is that he didn't look. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "nrp" wrote in message ups.com... I'm flabbergasted at how many of these comments refer to not following the radio procedures. Yes the Citation should have called, but most important is that he didn't look. We don't know that either is true. He may have used the radio, he or the OP may have been on the wrong frequency, the OP may have had his volume down, etc. He may have spotted the inbound traffic and felt he had plenty of room. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message news ![]() ....snip... We don't know that either is true. He may have used the radio, he or the OP may have been on the wrong frequency, the OP may have had his volume down, etc. He may have spotted the inbound traffic and felt he had plenty of room. The OP was on the correct frequency and had no trouble hearing and being heard on other transmissions. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nrp wrote:
I'm flabbergasted at how many of these comments refer to not following the radio procedures. Yes the Citation should have called, but most important is that he didn't look. We don't know that. Maybe he looked but didn't see. It happens. A Cherokee a half-mile away ought to be visible, but it's not a big target. Maybe he saw, judged that the Cherokee was not a factor. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:14:52 -0500, Dave Butler wrote:
Maybe he saw, judged that the Cherokee was not a factor. The most likely thought, it seems to me. Or maybe I am just a happy optimist. Still, he shouldn't have scared the Cherokee pilot. That's unforgiveable. It's not enough to judge that you're doing no harm: you ought to consider the possibility that the other guy is going to interpret your actions differently. If you scare someone in an airplane, he might whang into you. In Martha's cosmos, that would be a Bad Thing. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 12 | July 14th 04 06:05 PM |
Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Owning | 24 | July 14th 04 06:05 PM |
Rules on what can be in a hangar | Brett Justus | Owning | 13 | February 27th 04 05:35 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |