A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

report runway incursion non-towered airport?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 28th 05, 03:14 PM
nrp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm flabbergasted at how many of these comments refer to not following
the radio procedures. Yes the Citation should have called, but most
important is that he didn't look.

  #2  
Old February 28th 05, 03:41 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"nrp" wrote in message
ups.com...

I'm flabbergasted at how many of these comments refer to not following
the radio procedures. Yes the Citation should have called, but most
important is that he didn't look.


We don't know that either is true. He may have used the radio, he or the OP
may have been on the wrong frequency, the OP may have had his volume down,
etc. He may have spotted the inbound traffic and felt he had plenty of
room.


  #3  
Old February 28th 05, 04:02 PM
Joe Johnson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
news

....snip...

We don't know that either is true. He may have used the radio, he or the

OP
may have been on the wrong frequency, the OP may have had his volume down,
etc. He may have spotted the inbound traffic and felt he had plenty of
room.

The OP was on the correct frequency and had no trouble hearing and being
heard on other transmissions.


  #4  
Old March 4th 05, 08:14 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nrp wrote:
I'm flabbergasted at how many of these comments refer to not following
the radio procedures. Yes the Citation should have called, but most
important is that he didn't look.


We don't know that. Maybe he looked but didn't see. It happens. A Cherokee a
half-mile away ought to be visible, but it's not a big target. Maybe he saw,
judged that the Cherokee was not a factor.
  #5  
Old March 5th 05, 10:11 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:14:52 -0500, Dave Butler wrote:

Maybe he saw,
judged that the Cherokee was not a factor.


The most likely thought, it seems to me. Or maybe I am just a happy
optimist.

Still, he shouldn't have scared the Cherokee pilot. That's
unforgiveable. It's not enough to judge that you're doing no harm: you
ought to consider the possibility that the other guy is going to
interpret your actions differently. If you scare someone in an
airplane, he might whang into you. In Martha's cosmos, that would be a
Bad Thing.


-- all the best, Dan Ford

email (put Cubdriver in subject line)

Warbird's Forum:
www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com
the blog: www.danford.net
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Please help -- It's down to the wire Jay Honeck Home Built 12 July 14th 04 06:05 PM
Please help -- It's down to the wire Jay Honeck Owning 24 July 14th 04 06:05 PM
Rules on what can be in a hangar Brett Justus Owning 13 February 27th 04 05:35 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.