![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, we are talking about not one type, but two - because we can
say about a great degree of commonality between F/A-18A+ and C, or between F/A-18E, F/A-18F and (future) EA-18G. That is why every "older" CV (I mean: except CVN-75 and CVN-76) which is gonna to deploy with F/A-18E or F (or both), has to undergo some modifications first. CVW-9 in 2003 - with four F/A-18C squadrons (VFA-22, VFA-146, VFA-147, plus VMFA-314) - yes, that was commonality indeed, but capabilities (combat radius, on-station time, cycles lenght etc) must have suffered. Surely, putting Rhinos on carriers should be a progress when compared to MMH-eating F-14 and A-6s. But there will be a time some day when now brand-new F/A-18E/Fs also get older, and IF consider them "stealth" aircraft, they may require more maintenance to be kept as radar-clean as possible after being exposed to AAA/SAM fire and/or harsh weather conditions?... Regards, Jacek |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
U.S. Air Force to purchase 1,763 LOCKHEED MARTIN F-35 Joint Strike Fighter jets for $245 billion | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 0 | July 22nd 04 06:06 AM |
Spangdahlem-based fighter squadron performs 3-week exercise in preparation for deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 3rd 04 11:19 PM |
Joint Strike Fighter focus sparks concern | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | March 19th 04 09:19 PM |
A-4 / A-7 Question | Tank Fixer | Military Aviation | 135 | October 25th 03 03:59 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |