![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been up to Alaska and back twice in my Husky, as well as two trips
to Canada. There are usually tailwinds up the coast and tail winds down the Alaska highway, or the more more scenic but less historical Cassiar highway (through Smithers). The coast in the summer is doable, but cloudier than inland. There really is no way to know where the best weather would be. I would fly where the good weather is. Any and all of the routes are doable in a small airplane, though the Coast route does not follow a highway. There are three highways connecting the inland to the coast, all are mountainous. Canada permits longguns, essentially no pistols. There is a $50 Canadian fee and you have to declare them. Although there is a rather outdated, almost never enforced rule that you have a radio permit, if you doon't have one, don't bother. No one asks. I'd recommend carrying some food and survival gear, though it is not mandatory. Pistols are ok in a plane in Alaska but how are you going to get it there? No concealed carry on your person without permits in Alaska. Basically if you bring a gun, a shotgun makes the most sense and is the most politically correct. I've haven't been bothering, never have needed one. To cross the border, file a US flightplan and call Canadian Customs. It is easier to clear Customs at an airport that is not major, but is still big enough to have a full time Customs officer, so he doesn't have to drive in. Better to be a little late than early with your arrival. Flight plans are pretty much mandatory in Canada. Sporty's or some similar place sells charts, and you need the Canadian equivalent to the US Airport Facilities book. I used WACs and my updated GPS. Flying under Canadian rules is not a problem, there are some differences but not much. Go ahead and plan your flight, but be prepared to change your plans because one route can be weathered in and the other routes still flyable. The coast route is the most scenic and adventurous especially if you fly over the mountains to get there from inland. The Cassiar highway is more scenic than the Alaskan highway, but the Alaskan highway is more "historically interesting". But all three routes are doable, along with various combinations, though the coastal route is over water for at least some of the trip. You are going to have to fly over some water to get to Juneau, so you will be exposed to water anyway (unless you come in HIGH right over the mountain wilderness from the east, no road to follow and some of the MOST remote terrain I've ever seen). There is no road that connects Juneau to ANYWHERE. When you fly the coast you are usually flying over water but near land. This is true for the entire route. If you go to the coast count on getting weathered in for a day or two somewhere. Statistically July 4th is th clearest weather, certainly is the warment week of the year and has looong days. The trip is certainly doable. Get your aircraft in the best shape you can, buy the charts, update your GPS and go. It is a fantastic trip! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd recommend carrying some food and survival gear, though it is not mandatory.
Is that a recent change? A booklet I obtained from Transport Canada before my first trip to Alaska had a list of *required* survival gear. It included 10,000 calories per person, fishing gear, mosquito netting, sleeping bag, flares, and a number of other items. if you bring a gun, a shotgun makes the most sense and is the most politically correct. I've haven't been bothering IIRC, a gun is *required* in Alaska. Has that changed? My last trip there was about six years ago. Flight plans are pretty much mandatory in Canada. There is (or was) a loophole: As an alternative to a flight plan, you can "notify a reponsible adult" of your plans. On our trips we had several airplanes, so the pilot of one plane "notified" the pilot of another plane, etc. vince norris |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "vincent p. norris" wrote in message ... I'd recommend carrying some food and survival gear, though it is not mandatory. Is that a recent change? A booklet I obtained from Transport Canada before my first trip to Alaska had a list of *required* survival gear. It included 10,000 calories per person, fishing gear, mosquito netting, sleeping bag, flares, and a number of other items. Such particulars are no doubt a good idea, but the regulations are not this specific. The regulations requi : 602.61 ... no person shall operate an aircraft over : land unless there is carried on board survival equipment, sufficient for : the survival on the ground of each person on board, given the : geographical area, the season of the year and anticipated seasonal : climatic variations, that provides the means for : (a) starting a fire; : (b) providing shelter; : (c) providing or purifying water; and : (d) visually signalling distress. There are of course reasonable requirements for flights over water as well. ... Flight plans are pretty much mandatory in Canada. There is (or was) a loophole: As an alternative to a flight plan, you can "notify a reponsible adult" of your plans. On our trips we had several airplanes, so the pilot of one plane "notified" the pilot of another plane, etc. Not a loophole. An alternative. The VFR alternative to a VFR Flight Plan is a Flight Itinerary. One or the other is required for any flight more than 25 nm from the departure aerodrome, except that a Flight *Plan* is required for flights between Canada and a foreign state. A flight *Itinerary* can be filed formally with FSS/tower etc., or with a responsible person. A responsible person is "an individual who has agreed with the person who has filed a flight itinerary to ensure that the following are notified in the manner prescribed in this Division, if the aircraft is overdue, namely, (a) an air traffic control unit, a flight service station or a community aerodrome radio station, or (b) a Rescue Co-ordination Centre." http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/Re...602.htm#602_73 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/Re...602.htm#602_73
An interesting link. I was sure that when I researched this issue several years ago that Canada had very specific survival equipment requirements for flight over the "northern territories which included saw, hatchet, fishing line, long gun, etc. Seems all that has been simplified. Howard C182 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
FS 2004 Flight Planning | Dave Schwartz | Simulators | 4 | March 18th 04 03:49 AM |
Sim time loggable? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 6th 03 07:47 AM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |