![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, it appears that the contest reports are under the news section for
which you must log in with SSA member number and password. I have written Dennis Wright a note suggesting that both the reports and scores should be posted under the Contest Button so that anyone can access the scores and reports. I know that I enjoy reading contest reports and scores from other contries and feel that we should make this information universally available. If you feel as I do, please write Dennis a note. David Martin ASW27 BV |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It doesn't say anything anyway, just that there was a crash on practice
day. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know it's a dead horse, but I can't help but point out that this is
exactly the sort of accident that would be a lot less frequent with a 500 foot one mile circle finish. 70-80 kts right over the center of the airport at 51 feet is about the worst place you can be -- too much to land straight, too little to do a pattern. 70 knots, 501 feet, one mile out gives you a lot of time to think about what you're going to do next. 70 knots, 300 feet, one mile out means you're not going to make the flying finish at 500 feet, so you must roll. That decision is over, now use the whole mile to figure out how to land. Yes, pilots should think ahead to the pattern while also managing the stress of a tight glide. Yes, they should decide to do a rolling finish rather than focus entirely on the finishline and then wake up to the fact they have to land the darn thing. But everyone knows this advice, it's repeated over and over at the safety meetings, and we still get a crash like this once every few years -- usually with much worse results. A lower workload reduces the chances any of us will screw up. John Cochrane BB |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BB wrote:
I know it's a dead horse, but I can't help but point out that this is exactly the sort of accident that would be a lot less frequent with a 500 foot one mile circle finish. 70-80 kts right over the center of the airport at 51 feet is about the worst place you can be -- too much to land straight, too little to do a pattern. 70 knots, 501 feet, one mile out gives you a lot of time to think about what you're going to do next. 70 knots, 300 feet, one mile out means you're not going to make the flying finish at 500 feet, so you must roll. That decision is over, now use the whole mile to figure out how to land. We've used a 1000 foot two mile circle finish at the last two Minden regionals, which makes finishing a breeze. No problems, no complaints, no near misses, no one trying 180s at 100 feet, plenty of time to get everything put away, check that the water has finished dumping, make a nice leisurely traffic scan, then sequence for landing. On the other hand, at another recent regional contest I participated in, a vocal subgroup insisted upon using a finish gate with a 50 foot floor. There's nothing more exciting that dodging gliders coming from random directions at 100+ knots, while trying to make something approximating a normal pattern from my personal finish floor of 500 feet. That kind of excitement I can live without... Marc |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You must be aware that a pilot stalled and spun with water at 600'
attempting to get over the circle edge last season. So how is that safer??? Casey Lenox Phoenix KC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kilo Charlie wrote:
You must be aware that a pilot stalled and spun with water at 600' attempting to get over the circle edge last season. So how is that safer??? Maybe some of us are crazy, but we would rather stall and spin at 600 feet, than 200 feet, with or without water. Of course, my competitive urges being what they are, if I had any doubts about being able to make it to a 500 foot 1 mile finish, I'd be either still someplace farther back, trying to climb higher, or sitting in a convenient field. I don't want to win badly enough to do stupid things... Marc |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Final line is this Marc...you cannot legislate good judgement....period. If
you don't believe it then just go drive around in your car for awhile where there have already been put into place many laws in an attempt to do so. It is not the pilots that are conscientious and cautious that are the problem....no matter what the rules are they will do the right thing. There will always be those that are poor decision makers in a pinch. I wish that an instructor somewhere would have pointed this out to them but now that they have their license they can demonstrate to the world their inadequacies. Casey |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not aware of someone "stalling and spinning with water at 600'
attempting to get over the circle edge last season'. Where and when did this happen? What finish configuration was in use? I also can't imagine why. Under current US rules, even when there is a finish circle, and even when the CD announces a substantial minimum height for the circle, you are allowed to proceed directly to the field and get a rolling finish for speed points. You might lose the 1 minute of time between crossing the 1 mile circle and your landing, but that's better than any thermaling will do for you. So there is not even any competitive reason to be circling at 600' one mile out with water. John Cochrane BB |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() A rolling finish was a severe penalty. Straight in or just safely entering on base was out of the question. Buffeting, stalling then spinning a partially loaded aft CG glider got me a GPS fix in the safer circle finish. You could say that I didn't climb high enough, but I climbed as high as I could and left the last thermal at best L/D. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2005 Region 7 Contest | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | August 13th 04 03:48 AM |
Survival and Demise Kit; Contest Points | Jim Culp | Soaring | 1 | June 21st 04 04:35 AM |
USA Double Seater Contest | Thomas Knauff | Soaring | 1 | April 13th 04 05:24 PM |
30th Annual CCSC Soaring Contest | Mario Crosina | Soaring | 0 | March 17th 04 06:31 AM |
2003 Air Sailing Contest pre-report synopsis | Jim Price | Soaring | 0 | July 10th 03 10:19 PM |