A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Seniors Contest



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 8th 05, 11:59 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Change the rules any way you like, we'll find some new way to put
ourselves in a world of hurt... ;-)

  #2  
Old March 8th 05, 11:59 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Change the rules any way you like, we'll find some new way to put
ourselves in a world of hurt... ;-)

  #3  
Old March 14th 05, 11:16 PM
Brian Glick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John

I know you and respect your opinion, but you are wrong on this one. This was
a "relight" accident and the finish cylinder (or lack of one) would have
made no difference in this case. Sorry, but this arguement just does not
hold water this time!


"BB" wrote in message
oups.com...
I know it's a dead horse, but I can't help but point out that this is
exactly the sort of accident that would be a lot less frequent with a
500 foot one mile circle finish. 70-80 kts right over the center of the
airport at 51 feet is about the worst place you can be -- too much to
land straight, too little to do a pattern. 70 knots, 501 feet, one mile
out gives you a lot of time to think about what you're going to do
next. 70 knots, 300 feet, one mile out means you're not going to make
the flying finish at 500 feet, so you must roll. That decision is over,
now use the whole mile to figure out how to land.

Yes, pilots should think ahead to the pattern while also managing the
stress of a tight glide. Yes, they should decide to do a rolling
finish rather than focus entirely on the finishline and then wake up to
the fact they have to land the darn thing. But everyone knows this
advice, it's repeated over and over at the safety meetings, and we
still get a crash like this once every few years -- usually with much
worse results. A lower workload reduces the chances any of us will
screw up.


John Cochrane
BB



  #4  
Old March 14th 05, 11:46 PM
Steve Leonard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Uh, Brian. The accident John was referring to was the Practice Day
accident, which was a too low, too slow for a pattern return to the
airport. One that should have become a rolling finish.

Pretty bad when we refer to not just "an accident" at a contest, but
"the first" accident at a contest, isn't it?

Steve Leonard

Brian Glick wrote:
John

I know you and respect your opinion, but you are wrong on this one.

This was
a "relight" accident and the finish cylinder (or lack of one) would

have
made no difference in this case. Sorry, but this arguement just does

not
hold water this time!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2005 Region 7 Contest Paul Remde Soaring 0 August 13th 04 03:48 AM
Survival and Demise Kit; Contest Points Jim Culp Soaring 1 June 21st 04 04:35 AM
USA Double Seater Contest Thomas Knauff Soaring 1 April 13th 04 05:24 PM
30th Annual CCSC Soaring Contest Mario Crosina Soaring 0 March 17th 04 06:31 AM
2003 Air Sailing Contest pre-report synopsis Jim Price Soaring 0 July 10th 03 10:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.