![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Patterson" wrote in message ... Casey Wilson wrote: Has anybody else noticed this? Am I going bonkers? I also have Spybot, which I run every two or three weeks. The last two times I ran it, my computer came up clean. Since I am also under the distinct impression that you don't pick up cookies from usenet, I firmly believe you're getting yours from somewhere else. And use Spyware Blaster to keep them off your system between Spybot scans. http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/index.html |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Matt Barrow wrote: And use Spyware Blaster to keep them off your system between Spybot scans. If that keeps the system clean, would there be any need to use Spybot? George Patterson I prefer Heaven for climate but Hell for company. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Patterson" wrote in message ... Matt Barrow wrote: And use Spyware Blaster to keep them off your system between Spybot scans. If that keeps the system clean, would there be any need to use Spybot? Cross check and verification. In the two or three years since we've loaded it on all our networked systems we have not had a single piece of spyware get in. IOW, Spybot has been 100% redundant. I now do a Spybot check only about every three or four months. Interestingly, the one site that has attempted to load spyware, which was blocked before it could load (I turned on the annuciator just to see if it was really working), was WSJ's Opinion Journal which attempted to load "Avenue-A". -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|