A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

True Meaning Of VOR



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 11th 05, 04:28 AM
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Back in the day, the original "radio ranges" (or A-N ranges) were
directional navaids. They pointed along airway centerlines (or approach
paths) in selected directions.

The VOR was an "omni-range" in comparison to these earlier primitive
directional ranges, as the VOR was capable of defining a flight path in
an infinite number of directions around the compass, limited only by the
resolution of your equipment (fly heading 134.54 degrees??? grin

My 1965 AIM (all 120 pages) defines the VOR as the "VHF Omnidirectional
Range"

Dave

wrote:
Hi,

I am an aspiring flight student. I'd like my first message to this
group to be one with foot in mouth:

I am not convinced that the term VOR stands for "Very high frequenncy
omnidirectional range."

The problem is that, if I were an electrical engineer designing such a
device, knowing in advance how it worked, I'd be highly inclinded to
call it a "Very high frequency ominidirectional radiator" given that it
radiates in all directions using the VHF band.

Yet both the chapters by Rod Machado that comes with Micrsoft Flight
Simulator and the handbooks from the FAA say that it stands for
"...ominidirectional range", so I might be barking up a tall tree here,
but just a thought.

Is there anyone here whose experience in flight precede the advent of
VOR that could say what it stands for?

Thanks,

-Chaud Lapin-


  #2  
Old March 11th 05, 04:58 AM
Peter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave S wrote:

Back in the day, the original "radio ranges" (or A-N ranges) were
directional navaids. They pointed along airway centerlines (or approach
paths) in selected directions.

The VOR was an "omni-range" in comparison to these earlier primitive
directional ranges, as the VOR was capable of defining a flight path in
an infinite number of directions around the compass, limited only by the
resolution of your equipment (fly heading 134.54 degrees??? grin

My 1965 AIM (all 120 pages) defines the VOR as the "VHF Omnidirectional
Range"


Many ship harbors with narrow dredged channels have even more basic
"navigational ranges" that consist of two towers positioned on a
straight line in the direction of the channel. The taller tower is
located behind the shorter one and the ship's captain can follow the
correct course into the harbor by keeping the two towers lined up. If
the shorter one seems to drift to starboard he knows he needs to steer
that way until they're back in line.

wrote:

Hi,

I am an aspiring flight student. I'd like my first message to this
group to be one with foot in mouth:

I am not convinced that the term VOR stands for "Very high frequenncy
omnidirectional range."

The problem is that, if I were an electrical engineer designing such a
device, knowing in advance how it worked, I'd be highly inclinded to
call it a "Very high frequency ominidirectional radiator" given that it
radiates in all directions using the VHF band.

Yet both the chapters by Rod Machado that comes with Micrsoft Flight
Simulator and the handbooks from the FAA say that it stands for
"...ominidirectional range", so I might be barking up a tall tree here,
but just a thought.

Is there anyone here whose experience in flight precede the advent of
VOR that could say what it stands for?

Thanks,

-Chaud Lapin-



  #3  
Old March 11th 05, 10:21 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter" wrote

Many ship harbors with narrow dredged channels have even more basic
"navigational ranges" that consist of two towers positioned on a
straight line in the direction of the channel. The taller tower is
located behind the shorter one and the ship's captain can follow the
correct course into the harbor by keeping the two towers lined up. If
the shorter one seems to drift to starboard he knows he needs to steer
that way until they're back in line.


True, but what does that fact have to do with VOR?
--
Jim in NC


  #4  
Old March 11th 05, 01:58 PM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

"Peter" wrote

Many ship harbors with narrow dredged channels have even more basic
"navigational ranges" that consist of two towers positioned on a
straight line in the direction of the channel. The taller tower is
located behind the shorter one and the ship's captain can follow the
correct course into the harbor by keeping the two towers lined up. If
the shorter one seems to drift to starboard he knows he needs to steer
that way until they're back in line.


True, but what does that fact have to do with VOR?
--
Jim in NC


It is a range just like a VOR except without the VO.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 10:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
How Aircraft Stay In The Air Sarah Hotdesking Military Aviation 145 March 25th 04 05:13 PM
Great circle formulae, True cource and actual heading Sims Piloting 27 October 11th 03 01:55 PM
Former head of cadet discipline says she never saw a 'true rape' Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 11th 03 08:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.