![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am a fairly new contest pilot, flying in sport's class in the
northeast. If I had a competitive glider I might consider standard/15m class. So take my comments as someone who has never had to do a gate finish for real, but has considered them, practiced them and does consider them inherently dangerous. There is nothing inherently dangerous in a line finish accomplished by skillful pilots exercising good judgement. I consider them to be inherently dangerous because the solution for the fastest time pushes the pilot towards a very dangerous flying situation. Flying at best speed to fly for the last thermal all the way to 50agl at the finish line. For my Grob102, if I was in a 4 knot thermal that's 79 knots. Also it's a 25/1 glide ration so at 1 nm away I am at 290 feet, 2nm at 540 feet. This seems pretty dangerous to me. If I hit sink, then I am landing wherever the sink hit me, without any chance for picking a field, flying a pattern, etc. Even if don't hit sink, I am still only set up to land straight ahead past the finish line. So most pilots add some safety margin (in the form of extra potential energy), they take the thermal higher than they should (from a speed perspective). As they get closer to the finish line, they convert the potential energy to speed. Then re-convert the speed to height for a 'normal' pattern. The problem is that you score higher (faster) for a lower safety margin. Why not just set the minimum required safety margin for all pilots ? The required finish altitude is just that, a minimum safety margin for all contest pilots. The rules are saying "if you reduce the safety margin less than this, you will not get a better score than this." And, of course, there's the simplest solution of all. If you have to race, but don't like finish lines, then finish high. You are allowed to do that. But the rules should not provide a scoring benefit to the pilots who decide to reduce the safety margin. I don't want to be thinking "hey, if I really push this final glide I might make up that 20point advantage my competitor got yesterday." Todd Smith 3S |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2005 Region 7 Contest | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | August 13th 04 03:48 AM |
Survival and Demise Kit; Contest Points | Jim Culp | Soaring | 1 | June 21st 04 04:35 AM |
USA Double Seater Contest | Thomas Knauff | Soaring | 1 | April 13th 04 05:24 PM |
30th Annual CCSC Soaring Contest | Mario Crosina | Soaring | 0 | March 17th 04 06:31 AM |
2003 Air Sailing Contest pre-report synopsis | Jim Price | Soaring | 0 | July 10th 03 10:19 PM |