![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark James Boyd wrote:
I'm trying to think about this from the Sports Class perspective too. If I understand it, in Sports Class one chooses their own TPs, so the pilots can come in from any direction, and a cylinder around the airport wouldn't seem to solve much in terms of head-on surprises. The finish cylinder is basically a circle with (minimally) a 2 mile *diameter*. A typical one will have a floor of 500 feet and no top. Once the edge of the cylinder is crossed, one pulls up from the final glide speed, which may well in excess of 100 knots, to a more reasonable 55 or 60 knots for pattern and landing. Following the pull up you are usually at a minimum of 600 to 700 feet, and there is plenty of time to sort out traffic, and sequence for landing. People finishing from the same direction are no more of a problem than they are with a finish gate. People finishing from the opposite direction are also not a big deal, as both you and the head-on glider have normally slowed to 60 knots or less by the time you are within a mile of each other. Most people by that point have started a series of gradual clearing turns, so they can assess the traffic situation. By contrast, with a finish gate, you have gliders converging on the same point in space (thanks to GPS) at final glide speed of 100+ knots (if you're under 100 feet, you better be going at least that fast), pulling up to 200 feet or so (unless they have too little energy), then having to sort themselves within a few moments and land. Now throw an MAT (modified assigned task) into the mix, and things get interesting, as you get some gliders running straight into the gate, and others approaching the gate from one side or the other (and every once in a while some bozo goes through the gate in the wrong direction), then having to make a last minute high speed turn to go through the gate in the proper direction. Now yes, things are easier with a required final turnpoint (control point), several miles away from the finish gate, to get everyone finishing in the same direction, but not all (or even most, in my experience) contest directors bother to use them. Marc |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Marc. this is helpful.
In article , Marc Ramsey wrote: Mark James Boyd wrote: I'm trying to think about this from the Sports Class perspective too. If I understand it, in Sports Class one chooses their own TPs, so the pilots can come in from any direction, and a cylinder around the airport wouldn't seem to solve much in terms of head-on surprises. The finish cylinder is basically a circle with (minimally) a 2 mile *diameter*. A typical one will have a floor of 500 feet and no top. Once the edge of the cylinder is crossed, one pulls up from the final glide speed, which may well in excess of 100 knots, to a more reasonable 55 or 60 knots for pattern and landing. Following the pull up you are usually at a minimum of 600 to 700 feet, and there is plenty of time to sort out traffic, and sequence for landing. People finishing from the same direction are no more of a problem than they are with a finish gate. People finishing from the opposite direction are also not a big deal, as both you and the head-on glider have normally slowed to 60 knots or less by the time you are within a mile of each other. Most people by that point have started a series of gradual clearing turns, so they can assess the traffic situation. By contrast, with a finish gate, you have gliders converging on the same point in space (thanks to GPS) at final glide speed of 100+ knots (if you're under 100 feet, you better be going at least that fast), pulling up to 200 feet or so (unless they have too little energy), then having to sort themselves within a few moments and land. Now throw an MAT (modified assigned task) into the mix, and things get interesting, as you get some gliders running straight into the gate, and others approaching the gate from one side or the other (and every once in a while some bozo goes through the gate in the wrong direction), then having to make a last minute high speed turn to go through the gate in the proper direction. Now yes, things are easier with a required final turnpoint (control point), several miles away from the finish gate, to get everyone finishing in the same direction, but not all (or even most, in my experience) contest directors bother to use them. Marc -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2005 Region 7 Contest | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | August 13th 04 03:48 AM |
Survival and Demise Kit; Contest Points | Jim Culp | Soaring | 1 | June 21st 04 04:35 AM |
USA Double Seater Contest | Thomas Knauff | Soaring | 1 | April 13th 04 05:24 PM |
30th Annual CCSC Soaring Contest | Mario Crosina | Soaring | 0 | March 17th 04 06:31 AM |
2003 Air Sailing Contest pre-report synopsis | Jim Price | Soaring | 0 | July 10th 03 10:19 PM |