![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() There are two problems with electronic pitot/static TE. The magnitude of the compensation signal and its phase. The first is commonly adjustable on the instrument, the second isn't. Your pressure port and the combined flow resistance and capacity of the tubing form a low pass filter. If the pitot and static system filter time constants are greatly different you can get large transient indications on the vario during pull ups or push overs. So if you have a system that works adding another instrument and connecting it to the static system will usually cause a problem. Leaks will also cause problems, as would partially blocking the static port with wax.(flow resistance increases.) For optimum performance of electronic TE the pitot and static should be on the same side of the TE(nose or tail) and the pitot should be twice as far from the TE as the static is. (Former World champion Stig Oye told me of this and a couple of minutes thought convinced me) A combined pitot/static probe on the fin does not fulfill this condition and still results in "g" change effects the same as a TE probe but is more sensitive to pitch and sideslip than the common two hole Irving pattern probe. If you aren't having apparent problems with electronic TE you are lucky or you've got your vario on a very slow response speed where the unwanted transients are heavily damped. If you are having problems you want to get a good handle on the physics of what is going on in order to fix the problem. Mike Borgelt -- mborgelt ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ] - A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly - |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mborgelt wrote:
For optimum performance of electronic TE the pitot and static should be on the same side of the TE(nose or tail) and the pitot should be twice as far from the TE as the static is. (Former World champion Stig Oye told me of this and a couple of minutes thought convinced me) Mike, could you elaborate on this? It the vario is using electronic TE, it's not using a TE probe, so I'm confused about the "pitot and static should be on the same side of the TE(nose or tail)". What is TE referring to in your statement? -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why are TE probes so long? | Duane Eisenbeiss | Soaring | 36 | May 9th 04 06:58 AM |
Fine example of Tarver Engineering release for service | running with scissors | Military Aviation | 79 | March 3rd 04 01:48 PM |
Fine example of Tarver Engineering release for service | running with scissors | Instrument Flight Rules | 64 | March 3rd 04 05:01 AM |
Chuck Yeager-pitot tube | Ron | Military Aviation | 44 | October 9th 03 03:13 AM |
Pitot and static couplings for a TTU-205 | B2431 | Home Built | 0 | August 15th 03 07:25 AM |