A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sharing static and pitot line



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 12th 05, 12:49 AM
mborgelt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


There are two problems with electronic pitot/static TE. The magnitude of
the compensation signal and its phase.

The first is commonly adjustable on the instrument, the second isn't.

Your pressure port and the combined flow resistance and capacity of
the tubing form a low pass filter. If the pitot and static system
filter time constants are greatly different you can get large transient
indications on the vario during pull ups or push overs.

So if you have a system that works adding another instrument and
connecting it to the static system will usually cause a problem.

Leaks will also cause problems, as would partially blocking the static
port with wax.(flow resistance increases.)

For optimum performance of electronic TE the pitot and static should be
on the same side of the TE(nose or tail) and the pitot should be twice
as far from the TE as the static is. (Former World champion Stig Oye
told me of this and a couple of minutes thought convinced me)

A combined pitot/static probe on the fin does not fulfill this
condition and still results in "g" change effects the same as a TE
probe but is more sensitive to pitch and sideslip than the common two
hole Irving pattern probe.

If you aren't having apparent problems with electronic TE you are lucky
or you've got your vario on a very slow response speed where the
unwanted transients are heavily damped.

If you are having problems you want to get a good handle on the physics
of what is going on

in order to fix the problem.

Mike Borgelt


--
mborgelt
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly -

  #2  
Old March 12th 05, 03:00 AM
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

mborgelt wrote:

For optimum performance of electronic TE the pitot and static should be
on the same side of the TE(nose or tail) and the pitot should be twice
as far from the TE as the static is. (Former World champion Stig Oye
told me of this and a couple of minutes thought convinced me)


Mike, could you elaborate on this? It the vario is using electronic TE,
it's not using a TE probe, so I'm confused about the "pitot and static
should be on the same side of the TE(nose or tail)". What is TE
referring to in your statement?

--
Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why are TE probes so long? Duane Eisenbeiss Soaring 36 May 9th 04 06:58 AM
Fine example of Tarver Engineering release for service running with scissors Military Aviation 79 March 3rd 04 01:48 PM
Fine example of Tarver Engineering release for service running with scissors Instrument Flight Rules 64 March 3rd 04 05:01 AM
Chuck Yeager-pitot tube Ron Military Aviation 44 October 9th 03 03:13 AM
Pitot and static couplings for a TTU-205 B2431 Home Built 0 August 15th 03 07:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.