![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was just doing some polar math.
Let's say I'm on a Mc = 0 final glide in my ASW-27B. I cross the finish cylinder boundary at 500' and 60 knots (best L/D dry). I'm now 1 sm from the airport center. I fly at best L/D and reach the airfield with about 380' of altitude. This is about the same altitude I'd have if I'd crossed a finish gate at 100 knots and 50 feet then pulled up. If on the other hand I cross the cylinder at 150 knots and 500' I will reach the airfield at 50', still at 150 knots. After my pullup I will have something more than 900'. I know which scenario I prefer. It's all about total energy. If you think total energy is more about 500' of altitude than an extra 90 knots of airspeed I suggest you do the math. My suggestion is to keep these issues the domain of the CD and contest organizers. They understand best the local airport and traffic patterns and the nature of the local conditions. Low total energy finishes should be (and are) subject to penalty at the CD's discretion. It's easy enough to judge off of GPS logs now. 9B At 00:00 12 March 2005, Eric Greenwell wrote: wrote: First, when do you pull in a cylinder finish? How about when it's clear? There's no hurry, unlike being 50 feet off the ground. When the gps goes beep? How do I know mine will go beep in sequence with yours? What if I delay my pull? I'm guessing you'd continue in the direction you are headed. Since you are 500' in the air, this shouldn't cause any heartburn. What risk am I taking? What are the speed differentials among the gliders in the gaggle? With a finish line, high and low energy aircraft separate naturally. You'll have to explain how this happens. I've seen high and low speed gliders close together at finish lines, and if the high speed glider is lower than the others, watch out! He's eager to climb up to pattern height and isn't going to coast along for another 1000' or so. Will the pilot above and behind me pushing to redline notice I'm in front flying at best L/D in an attempt to avoid missing the bottom of the cyliner? He's safe - he'll separate from you when he pulls up, and you aren't going to pull up. That's a good situation. It seems unlikely he won't see you ahead of him as he approaches. I've seen the same situation finish gates, anyway. And where is the cylinder? Why, it's right there on my instrument panel! Next to the altimeter, my other sore distraction. I think if you can keep track of the other gliders zooming into a finish line from various altitudes and angles, you'd be able to manage a finish cylinder. At least, as you approach the cylinder, the gliders that will enter the cylinder near you are all going the same direction you are, which is often not true at a finish line. When was the last time we wanted to ban gaggles for safety reasons? I think most of us have wanted to elimanate *large* gaggles, but no one has figured out a good way to do it. My theory is that ignorance shows more profoundly low and fast than high and slow. If by ignorance, you mean 'poor judgement', I agree with you, and I think this is the theory behind the finish cylinders, isn't it? -- Change 'netto' to 'net' to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy Blackburn wrote:
Let's say I'm on a Mc = 0 final glide in my ASW-27B. I cross the finish cylinder boundary at 500' and 60 knots (best L/D dry). I'm now 1 sm from the airport center. I fly at best L/D and reach the airfield with about 380' of altitude. This is about the same altitude I'd have if I'd crossed a finish gate at 100 knots and 50 feet then pulled up. If on the other hand I cross the cylinder at 150 knots and 500' I will reach the airfield at 50', still at 150 knots. After my pullup I will have something more than 900'. I know which scenario I prefer. What, exactly, is your point? This makes no sense... Marc |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't argue with 9B re the logic of the math issue....trust me....he's a
very bright guy and never leaves his calculator! He is offering the mathematical explanation of why cylinder finishes may not be any safer. Of course it supports my point so I'm thinkin' he's a rad dude! It's been a good discussion guys.....hope that all of you have a super weekend of soaring whatever height you choose to finish! Casey Lenox KC Phoenix |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kilo Charlie wrote:
Don't argue with 9B re the logic of the math issue....trust me....he's a very bright guy and never leaves his calculator! He is offering the mathematical explanation of why cylinder finishes may not be any safer. Of course it supports my point so I'm thinkin' he's a rad dude! Hmm, I pegged him for a lawyer or politician, the numbers may have some basis in reality (assuming you fly in a vacuum), but the logic is, uh, "interesting". It's been a good discussion guys.....hope that all of you have a super weekend of soaring whatever height you choose to finish! Agreed... Marc |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kilo Charlie wrote:
Don't argue with 9B re the logic of the math issue....trust me....he's a very bright guy and never leaves his calculator! He is offering the mathematical explanation of why cylinder finishes may not be any safer. Of course it supports my point so I'm thinkin' he's a rad dude! Hmm, I pegged him for a lawyer or politician, the numbers may have some basis in reality (assuming you fly in a vacuum), but the logic is, uh, "interesting". It's been a good discussion guys.....hope that all of you have a super weekend of soaring whatever height you choose to finish! Agreed... Marc |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
well... as most finishes would be at worm burner speeds even for the
cylinder, not bet L/D speed... at least you would start the "zoom" from 100knts and 500ft higher? even if 1/2 mile from the runway instead of 10 ft over it. flying the cylinder at best L/d would be conservative if you were going to barely make it home.. I would think BT "Kilo Charlie" wrote in message news:m6uYd.43315$FM3.18415@fed1read02... Don't argue with 9B re the logic of the math issue....trust me....he's a very bright guy and never leaves his calculator! He is offering the mathematical explanation of why cylinder finishes may not be any safer. Of course it supports my point so I'm thinkin' he's a rad dude! It's been a good discussion guys.....hope that all of you have a super weekend of soaring whatever height you choose to finish! Casey Lenox KC Phoenix |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 05:09 AM |
Lycoming O-290-D options | Gene Z. Ragan | Home Built | 6 | March 11th 04 10:17 AM |
New Army Aviation Options? | Thomas Schoene | Military Aviation | 22 | February 29th 04 09:51 PM |
Options in Summer of '45 | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 0 | December 24th 03 04:15 PM |
Small Blue Planet Toys goes Postal !! Economy Shipping Options now availalble | Small Blue Planet Toys | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 11th 03 04:00 PM |