A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Options



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 12th 05, 02:40 AM
Andy Blackburn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was just doing some polar math.

Let's say I'm on a Mc = 0 final glide in my ASW-27B.
I cross the finish cylinder boundary at 500' and 60
knots (best L/D dry). I'm now 1 sm from the airport
center. I fly at best L/D and reach the airfield with
about 380' of altitude. This is about the same altitude
I'd have if I'd crossed a finish gate at 100 knots
and 50 feet then pulled up.

If on the other hand I cross the cylinder at 150 knots
and 500' I will reach the airfield at 50', still at
150 knots. After my pullup I will have something more
than 900'. I know which scenario I prefer.

It's all about total energy. If you think total energy
is more about 500' of altitude than an extra 90 knots
of airspeed I suggest you do the math.

My suggestion is to keep these issues the domain of
the CD and contest organizers. They understand best
the local airport and traffic patterns and the nature
of the local conditions. Low total energy finishes
should be (and are) subject to penalty at the CD's
discretion. It's easy enough to judge off of GPS logs
now.

9B

At 00:00 12 March 2005, Eric Greenwell wrote:
wrote:
First, when do you pull in a cylinder finish?


How about when it's clear? There's no hurry, unlike
being 50 feet off
the ground.

When the
gps goes beep? How do I know mine will go beep in
sequence with yours?
What if I delay my pull?


I'm guessing you'd continue in the direction you are
headed. Since you
are 500' in the air, this shouldn't cause any heartburn.

What risk am I taking? What are the speed
differentials among the gliders in the gaggle? With
a finish line, high
and low energy aircraft separate naturally.


You'll have to explain how this happens. I've seen
high and low speed
gliders close together at finish lines, and if the
high speed glider is
lower than the others, watch out! He's eager to climb
up to pattern
height and isn't going to coast along for another 1000'
or so.

Will the pilot above and
behind me pushing to redline notice I'm in front flying
at best L/D in
an attempt to avoid missing the bottom of the cyliner?


He's safe - he'll separate from you when he pulls up,
and you aren't
going to pull up. That's a good situation. It seems
unlikely he won't
see you ahead of him as he approaches. I've seen the
same situation
finish gates, anyway.

And where is the
cylinder? Why, it's right there on my instrument panel!
Next to the
altimeter, my other sore distraction.


I think if you can keep track of the other gliders
zooming into a finish
line from various altitudes and angles, you'd be able
to manage a finish
cylinder. At least, as you approach the cylinder, the
gliders that will
enter the cylinder near you are all going the same
direction you are,
which is often not true at a finish line.

When was the last time we wanted to ban gaggles for
safety reasons?


I think most of us have wanted to elimanate *large*
gaggles, but no one
has figured out a good way to do it.

My theory is that ignorance shows more profoundly
low and fast than
high and slow.


If by ignorance, you mean 'poor judgement', I agree
with you, and I
think this is the theory behind the finish cylinders,
isn't it?



--
Change 'netto' to 'net' to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA




  #2  
Old March 12th 05, 03:59 AM
Marc Ramsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Andy Blackburn wrote:
Let's say I'm on a Mc = 0 final glide in my ASW-27B.
I cross the finish cylinder boundary at 500' and 60
knots (best L/D dry). I'm now 1 sm from the airport
center. I fly at best L/D and reach the airfield with
about 380' of altitude. This is about the same altitude
I'd have if I'd crossed a finish gate at 100 knots
and 50 feet then pulled up.

If on the other hand I cross the cylinder at 150 knots
and 500' I will reach the airfield at 50', still at
150 knots. After my pullup I will have something more
than 900'. I know which scenario I prefer.


What, exactly, is your point? This makes no sense...

Marc
  #3  
Old March 12th 05, 04:20 AM
Kilo Charlie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Don't argue with 9B re the logic of the math issue....trust me....he's a
very bright guy and never leaves his calculator! He is offering the
mathematical explanation of why cylinder finishes may not be any safer. Of
course it supports my point so I'm thinkin' he's a rad dude!

It's been a good discussion guys.....hope that all of you have a super
weekend of soaring whatever height you choose to finish!

Casey Lenox
KC
Phoenix


  #4  
Old March 12th 05, 04:28 AM
Marc Ramsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kilo Charlie wrote:
Don't argue with 9B re the logic of the math issue....trust me....he's a
very bright guy and never leaves his calculator! He is offering the
mathematical explanation of why cylinder finishes may not be any safer. Of
course it supports my point so I'm thinkin' he's a rad dude!


Hmm, I pegged him for a lawyer or politician, the numbers may have some
basis in reality (assuming you fly in a vacuum), but the logic is, uh,
"interesting".

It's been a good discussion guys.....hope that all of you have a super
weekend of soaring whatever height you choose to finish!


Agreed...

Marc


  #5  
Old March 12th 05, 04:29 AM
Marc Ramsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kilo Charlie wrote:
Don't argue with 9B re the logic of the math issue....trust me....he's a
very bright guy and never leaves his calculator! He is offering the
mathematical explanation of why cylinder finishes may not be any safer. Of
course it supports my point so I'm thinkin' he's a rad dude!


Hmm, I pegged him for a lawyer or politician, the numbers may have some
basis in reality (assuming you fly in a vacuum), but the logic is, uh,
"interesting".

It's been a good discussion guys.....hope that all of you have a super
weekend of soaring whatever height you choose to finish!


Agreed...

Marc


  #6  
Old March 12th 05, 05:36 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

well... as most finishes would be at worm burner speeds even for the
cylinder, not bet L/D speed... at least you would start the "zoom" from
100knts and 500ft higher? even if 1/2 mile from the runway instead of 10 ft
over it.

flying the cylinder at best L/d would be conservative if you were going to
barely make it home.. I would think

BT

"Kilo Charlie" wrote in message
news:m6uYd.43315$FM3.18415@fed1read02...
Don't argue with 9B re the logic of the math issue....trust me....he's a
very bright guy and never leaves his calculator! He is offering the
mathematical explanation of why cylinder finishes may not be any safer.
Of course it supports my point so I'm thinkin' he's a rad dude!

It's been a good discussion guys.....hope that all of you have a super
weekend of soaring whatever height you choose to finish!

Casey Lenox
KC
Phoenix



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) Anonymous Spamless Military Aviation 0 April 21st 04 05:09 AM
Lycoming O-290-D options Gene Z. Ragan Home Built 6 March 11th 04 10:17 AM
New Army Aviation Options? Thomas Schoene Military Aviation 22 February 29th 04 09:51 PM
Options in Summer of '45 Matt Wiser Military Aviation 0 December 24th 03 04:15 PM
Small Blue Planet Toys goes Postal !! Economy Shipping Options now availalble Small Blue Planet Toys Aviation Marketplace 0 July 11th 03 04:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.