![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First off, my apoligies to Jack for any perceived offense about my
new buyer remark. Since he has experienced buyers involved as partners it really doesn't apply to him and is simply based on my experience. Two of my previous sales were with buyers located far away. I simply never let a plane I'm selling go somewhere else for the prebuy. That eliminates the fear of the plane being taken apart and being held hostage to an unscrupulous buyer controlled A/P. What I do is make arrangements with my home shop to make available space and any needed equipment (at my expense) in their shop. Then the prebuy mechanic can come there and do the prebuy. And my mechanic can deal with fixing anything they want fixed. I haven't had any objections to this and it's worked well for all concerned. "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:a6uYd.59212$r55.44222@attbi_s52... If the seller seems odd about anything during the sale, that is good reason to let it go. Well from the seller's perspective the same goes. I've had good buyers and bad ones. I have a somewhat unique perspective here, as I have met both the potential buyer (Jack) and the seller. (Last week I flew to Wisconsin to lend a casual eye to the bird for Jack.) In this case, I'd say both parties were "good", but distance and circumstances conspired against the sale. IMHO, here's why: 1. Jack is 1500 miles away 2. The seller had a local buyer that was interested in the plane. 3. Jack understandably wanted a pre-buy inspection conducted at a "neutral" location. 4. The seller was understandably wary of letting his prized Arrow be dismantled by an unknown shop, especially in light of #2, above. 5. The seller made personal contact with the "neutral" shop that made him even more uncomfortable. 6. The seller started to ponder the awful possibility that (a) the "neutral" shop could tear his plane apart and find something wrong, which would (b) cause his erstwhile potential buyers -- located inconveniently on the other side of the continent -- to withdraw from the deal and (c) potentially leave him to pay the "neutral" shop for the work, if Jack and his partners turned out to be nefarious cretins. All of these factors came into play -- most importantly #2. IMHO, without #2 the seller might well have silently swallowed his worries, and gone through with the deal. But who knows? The whole experience can be frustrating, but in this case it's probably all for the best that the deal fell apart. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OtisWinslow wrote:
First off, my apoligies to Jack for any perceived offense about my new buyer remark. Since he has experienced buyers involved as partners it really doesn't apply to him and is simply based on my experience. No sweat Otis, no offense taken. I freely admit that I'm a newbie airplane buyer and, while I'm learning a ton, it's a first time experience and I'm bound to miss some things. I'm thankful that our partnership does have ownership experience though. I'm also grateful for the advice received in my recent posts. Whether it's ideas like Jim Burns and working with the FAA database to create leads or experiences like yours, I learn some things and get some good advice. Two of my previous sales were with buyers located far away. I simply never let a plane I'm selling go somewhere else for the prebuy. That eliminates the fear of the plane being taken apart and being held hostage to an unscrupulous buyer controlled A/P. What I do is make arrangements with my home shop to make available space and any needed equipment (at my expense) in their shop. Then the prebuy mechanic can come there and do the prebuy. And my mechanic can deal with fixing anything they want fixed. I haven't had any objections to this and it's worked well for all concerned. This is a great idea Otis. A nice compromise between buyer and seller. Now, if I could just find an Arrow located a short hop away from my home airport. Jay - thanks for posting your experience here as your unique position in this whole adventure does provide a good perspective. -- Jack Allison PP-ASEL-IA Student-Arrow Buying Student "When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return" - Leonardo Da Vinci (Remove the obvious from address to reply via e-mail) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
430/530 Back Course Question... | Bill Hale | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | February 12th 04 05:04 AM |
Memories come flying back for ex-air corpsmen | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 10th 03 08:56 PM |
The Little Wheel in Back | Veeduber | Home Built | 6 | September 8th 03 10:29 AM |
Localizer Back Course vs. ILS | ilsub | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 25th 03 04:04 PM |
they took me back in time and the nsa or japan wired my head and now they know the idea came from me so if your back in time and wounder what happen they change tim liverance history for good. I work at rts wright industries and it a time travel trap | tim liverance | Military Aviation | 0 | August 18th 03 12:18 AM |