A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Glass Panel Failure Rate?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 16th 05, 12:49 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:34:17 -0500, "Morgans"
wrote:


"Blueskies" wrote

It has to have the additional WAAS avionics goodies. Simple GPS needs the

backup.


You are picking nits. WASS *IS* GPS, MAN!

You said you could not use GPS alone for IFR. Yes you can, GPS with the
WAAS is STILL GPS!


I really don't want to get into the middle of this discussion, but
what do you think the ratio of installed WAAS nav systems to
enroute/approach GPS/RNAV systems is currently? 1 in 10? 1 in 100? 1
in 1000?

Do you need WAAS to fly a stand-alone GPS approach? Do you need
"conventional" nav gear present to fly a stand-alone GPS/RNAV
approach? For that matter, how does one determine if installed
equipment meets the requirements for a stand-alone GPS/RNAV approach?

TC
  #2  
Old March 16th 05, 01:17 AM
Jay Beckman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:34:17 -0500, "Morgans"
wrote:


"Blueskies" wrote

It has to have the additional WAAS avionics goodies. Simple GPS needs
the

backup.


You are picking nits. WASS *IS* GPS, MAN!

You said you could not use GPS alone for IFR. Yes you can, GPS with the
WAAS is STILL GPS!


I really don't want to get into the middle of this discussion, but
what do you think the ratio of installed WAAS nav systems to
enroute/approach GPS/RNAV systems is currently? 1 in 10? 1 in 100? 1
in 1000?

Do you need WAAS to fly a stand-alone GPS approach? Do you need
"conventional" nav gear present to fly a stand-alone GPS/RNAV
approach? For that matter, how does one determine if installed
equipment meets the requirements for a stand-alone GPS/RNAV approach?

TC


http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/factcard.pdf

Down the right-hand column, they break down percentages of who has what
installed.

Not certain how current the info is...

Jay B


  #3  
Old March 16th 05, 03:35 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:17:58 -0700, "Jay Beckman"
wrote:

snip
http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/factcard.pdf

Down the right-hand column, they break down percentages of who has what
installed.

Not certain how current the info is...

Jay B


Kewl chart, plus it sorta indicates what I am thinking. They don't
even have a listing for GPS/precision approach equipment.

There are GPS RNAV/LNAV systems in service, and even a few GPS
RNAV/LNAV/VNAV systems in service, but currently not a lot of WAAS
systems.

TC
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 03:26 PM
Glass Panel Scan? G Farris Instrument Flight Rules 6 October 13th 04 05:14 AM
TSA requirement of Security Awareness Training dancingstar Piloting 3 October 5th 04 03:17 AM
C182 Glass Panel Scott Schluer Piloting 15 February 27th 04 04:52 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 02:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.