![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote in
: AOPA warns that someone is trying the scam of spamming pilots saying that MBNA needs for them to verify their account info. These mails are not from MBNA. Do not click on the link. I've discovered that most of them come from Korea and China. They pick the images from a legitimate site but post your information to some site in Seoul. -- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What they've been doing recently is opening the real site with the address
bar showing, and opening a login popup, showing no address bar. More often than not, the popup doesn't work. They're getting shut down pretty quickly, but I'm sure some people are going for it. I usually type in a few obscenities after I send the report to the correct party. "John Godwin" wrote in message . 3.44... George Patterson wrote in : AOPA warns that someone is trying the scam of spamming pilots saying that MBNA needs for them to verify their account info. These mails are not from MBNA. Do not click on the link. I've discovered that most of them come from Korea and China. They pick the images from a legitimate site but post your information to some site in Seoul. -- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Steve Foley" wrote: What they've been doing recently is opening the real site with the address bar showing, and opening a login popup, showing no address bar. More often than not, the popup doesn't work. They're getting shut down pretty quickly, but I'm sure some people are going for it. I usually type in a few obscenities after I send the report to the correct party. They are also getting increasingly sophisticated. I used to be able to tell immediately from the shoddy graphics that it wasn't the real thing. Not long ago, I got one phishing for my Citibank info that I couldn't tell apart from the real thing. It also used to be that you could be careful and look in the status bar (or wherever your particular browser shows you a preview of a link the mouse is hovering over) to make sure it was real. The text on the screen would say "www.citibank.com", but the URL preview would say "123.456.78.90" and you'd know it was a fake. Now they're building URLs in the links with non-ascii characters which display in your browser looking like the real thing, but resolve to a different IP. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roy Smith" wrote in message news:roy-
They are also getting increasingly sophisticated. I used to be able to tell immediately from the shoddy graphics that it wasn't the real thing. Not long ago, I got one phishing for my Citibank info that I couldn't tell apart from the real thing. Well, perhaps cosmetically. There's so many other clues that it is a scam that one has to wonder at who would actually respond to these things. Recently, I received a very legitimate SunTrust Bank scam. I was bored and decided to go ahead click the links and fill out the form with required (but fake) information. Y'all ought to do it sometime. It is quite interesting. They asked for my name, address, phone number, mother maiden name, Social Security number, bank account & routing number, and other information that was very personal that no bank would ever request. It is very difficult for me to imagine someone who would be so naive or stupid enough to actually enter real information. I consider it Digital Darwinism. Some folks just don't need to own a computer. -- Jim Fisher |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Fisher" wrote:
They asked for my name, address, phone number, mother maiden name, Social Security number, bank account & routing number, and other information that was very personal that no bank would ever request. It is very difficult for me to imagine someone who would be so naive or stupid enough to actually enter real information. Con games have been going on forever. I first heard of the "I found some money and I'll split it with you, but you have to put up $X to show your good faith" scam when I was a kid (my father told me how it worked). I next heard of it a bunch of years later when a woman I was working with fell victim to it. She came in one morning and started telling a strange story of how somebody approached her and said they had found $10,000 or some such. She was flabbergasted when I finished the story for her. These days, the same scam is still going around, the only difference being that email has taken over as the transmission mechanism. These scams survive because they continue to work. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:46:04 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
"Jim Fisher" wrote: They asked for my name, address, phone number, mother maiden name, Social Security number, bank account & routing number, and other information that was very personal that no bank would ever request. It is very difficult for me to imagine someone who would be so naive or stupid enough to actually enter real information. Con games have been going on forever. I first heard of the "I found some money and I'll split it with you, but you have to put up $X to show your good faith" scam when I was a kid (my father told me how it worked). I next heard of it a bunch of years later when a woman I was working with fell victim to it. She came in one morning and started telling a strange story of how somebody approached her and said they had found $10,000 or some such. She was flabbergasted when I finished the story for her. These days, the same scam is still going around, the only difference being that email has taken over as the transmission mechanism. These scams survive because they continue to work. They survive and continue to work because people are greedy and are then embarrested too much to say they were scamed. As you say, they are nothing new, but the delivery method has changed. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Fisher" wrote:
I consider it Digital Darwinism. Some folks just don't need to own a computer. Anybody who has ever worked in IT should recognize this story. The help desk gets a call from somebody having trouble setting up their new computer. The tech goes back and forth with the person, asking questions like, "Can you read me exactly what it says on the screen now?" and getting answers that can't possibly be correct. After a half an hour of this, the tech says, "Sir, do you still have the box the computer came in?". The hapless person on the phone admits that he does. "OK, sir, what I want you to do is take the computer, put it back in the box, and return it to the store you bought it from. You are obviously too stupid to own a a computer". That's the funny part. The sad part of it is that at least half of the time, the problem is that the software that comes with these things is just crap, and it's a miracle that most people can get it to work at all. I've been doing network for the past 20 years. For the past 5 years, I've been writing software to manage networks. Yet, for the past couple of weeks, I've been fighting trying to get two off-the-shelf consumer devices talking to each other over my home network. If I can't figure it out (armed with packet sniffers, protocol debuggers, and a computer science degree), how are Mr. and Mrs. J. Random Customer supposed to manage? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Smith wrote:
After a half an hour of this, the tech says, "Sir, do you still have the box the computer came in?". The hapless person on the phone admits that he does. "OK, sir, what I want you to do is take the computer, put it back in the box, and return it to the store you bought it from. You are obviously too stupid to own a a computer". True story, the problem was because the electricity was off, and the computer owner thought it should work without any... Tech was fired over that comment too... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Darrel Toepfer" wrote in message
. .. Roy Smith wrote: After a half an hour of this, the tech says, "Sir, do you still have the box the computer came in?". The hapless person on the phone admits that he does. "OK, sir, what I want you to do is take the computer, put it back in the box, and return it to the store you bought it from. You are obviously too stupid to own a a computer". True story, the problem was because the electricity was off, and the computer owner thought it should work without any... Tech was fired over that comment too... Nope, urban legend. http://www.snopes.com/humor/business/wordperf.htm --Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
AOPA credit card --- WARNING. | RS | Piloting | 356 | December 14th 04 01:49 PM |
AOPA credit card --- WARNING. | RS | Owning | 340 | December 9th 04 05:04 AM |
AOPA VISA card fraud via XM Radio? | Dan Luke | Piloting | 5 | July 5th 04 06:38 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |