![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Mar 2005 14:19:03 -0800, "Bob" wrote:
Hi John, . Now in the air in ACM it was a dog and took both hands to pull max G's. Pretty good vertical with it's power and gave you a real edge over guys who didn't like to get their nose up. Nasty and unrecoverable flat spin mode, not as bad as the F-14 but usually resulted in either a punch out or a mort. So you didn't spin it, simple enough. The guy who told you the F-4 was scary dirty must have been a helo pilot or an USAF guy. Not all that analytical for sure. That's low. Really low. And, notice how I resist saying that USAF guys could pull max G with out using two hands. I just wouldn't say something like that. Of course, if you didn't have to hover on the CAP at "max conserve" orbiting at 250 KIAS to meet cycle time it was a lot easier. Just run around the alloted area a bit above corner velocity and you can grab all the G you want with one hand. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Rasimus wrote:
On 26 Mar 2005 14:19:03 -0800, "Bob" wrote: Hi John, . Now in the air in ACM it was a dog and took both hands to pull max G's. Pretty good vertical with it's power and gave you a real edge over guys who didn't like to get their nose up. Nasty and unrecoverable flat spin mode, not as bad as the F-14 but usually resulted in either a punch out or a mort. So you didn't spin it, simple enough. The guy who told you the F-4 was scary dirty must have been a helo pilot or an USAF guy. Not all that analytical for sure. That's low. Really low. And, notice how I resist saying that USAF guys could pull max G with out using two hands. I just wouldn't say something like that. Of course, if you didn't have to hover on the CAP at "max conserve" orbiting at 250 KIAS to meet cycle time it was a lot easier. Just run around the alloted area a bit above corner velocity and you can grab all the G you want with one hand. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" www.thunderchief.org www.thundertales.blogspot.com Two hands to pull 'max 'G'? Hogwash. I could overstress the thing w/o problem. As for everything else, pretty close. I did love it but never heard of one in a flat spin. Lots of OOC, spin stuff but nothing flat. Even when the stab horns were breaking, 1976.7, we lost a F-4J(VF-33) when it broke. The plane spun but when the airloads allowed the stab to fall full leading edge up, it recovered. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, you are strong. Stick force to get 9 Gs at 600 kts at 1000 ft was
over 50 pounds. Not many good reasons to be doing that in ACM since the vertical was best for the F-4. The F-4 had a rare but unrecoverable flat spin mode. In this mode we tried everything including special anti-spin chutes and still never recovered one. Most of these flat spins were entered from very nose high, slow speed high yaw maneuvers, like trying to kick the nose down from a very high yo with the rudders. Drag chutes, even anti-spin chutes just streamed above you. very gentle spin rate and low altitude loss per turn but just plain unrecoverable. We lost at least four F-4s at Pax learning about this mode. MacD denied it even existed. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob wrote:
OK, you are strong. Stick force to get 9 Gs at 600 kts at 1000 ft was over 50 pounds. Not many good reasons to be doing that in ACM since the vertical was best for the F-4. The F-4 had a rare but unrecoverable flat spin mode. In this mode we tried everything including special anti-spin chutes and still never recovered one. Most of these flat spins were entered from very nose high, slow speed high yaw maneuvers, like trying to kick the nose down from a very high yo with the rudders. Drag chutes, even anti-spin chutes just streamed above you. very gentle spin rate and low altitude loss per turn but just plain unrecoverable. We lost at least four F-4s at Pax learning about this mode. MacD denied it even existed. How about 8.5 g(the max for a clean F-4J) and corner, about 450 kts. As for 'not many reasons', well ask Rookie Rab that when he saw Mig-17 tracers goin' over his canopy... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFI without commercial? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 75 | December 8th 10 04:17 PM |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |