![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian:
I'm not comfortable with that explanation. The glider goes "up" only in relation to the earth, not in relation to the airmass. In fact, the glider is steady in the airmass -- descending at 2 kts (more or less) -- and we only seek out the rising airmass because it puts us higher relative to the earth. Your explanation makes it sound as if the glider is staying steady relative to the earth while the airmass accelerates from 2 to 6 kts. (If this is so, it is only very momentary.) I think Terry and Burt have the explanation that is both aerodynamically accurate and something a student can grasp relatively quickly and easily. Thanks to all. Fred |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fred,
The thermal is giving you "free lift". Since the wing now doesn't produce as much lift, induced drag is simultaneously reduced. With reduced drag, airspeed increases. Hope this helps, Brad On 27 Mar 2005 09:33:53 -0800, "Fred" wrote: Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How do you explain it? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Edmond Dantes wrote: Fred, The thermal is giving you "free lift". Since the wing now doesn't produce as much lift, induced drag is simultaneously reduced. With reduced drag, airspeed increases. Hope this helps, Brad There is no such thing as "free lift". The wing/tailplane produces lift -- all of it. If you feel a push upwards, it is the wing doing it. As you enter the updraft you get an increased angle of atack, increased lift, increased drag, and upwards acceleration. As noted by others, if you leave the stick in the same place then the speed will increase due to stability making the glider pitch down, but thsi will only be a very temporary effect and will dissappear soon after the glider's vertical speed has equalized with the updraft -- which is only a matter of a second or two. Consider that it's pretty common to feel a half-G surge on entering a strong thermal, that a G is 10 m/s per second, and that strong thermals are 4 - 7 m/s, and and it's clear that the glider gains the upwards velocity of the thermal pretty quickly. -- Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+- Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O---------- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmm...
I thought that if the CG is forward, a 'bump' in lift is behind it (where the wing center of pressure is maybe) and so the wing is accelerated up and the nose pitches down. Try it with drastically different CG. I tried it with a 240# guy up front. Big difference from the 160# guy up front. Anyway, that's my take on it... At 00:00 28 March 2005, Terry wrote: Fred wrote: Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How do you explain it? ================================================= ================= ======== I'll stick my neck out on this. In gliding flight, the horizontal component of lift is our 'thrust' that enables an airspeed, while the vertical component is equal to the weight of the glider. Once the thermal is entered, there is an increase in the total lift vector equal to strength of the thermal. This results in an imbalance of forces which causes the glider to accelerate to the new steady state. I flew for years on the east coast of the US and never noticed this effect until moving out west. Estrella has some strong days were this effect is very noticable, especially in clean ships. The lowly 233 exhibits the same effect, just not as noticable. Terry Claussen Master CFI Mark J. Boyd |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's called the Yates Effect and the mechanism described
by Yates in Gliding magazine in 1951 is basically an expanded version of what Robin says. Derek Piggot has an Appendix on the subject in Understanding Gliding. The inverse is also the explanation for the more important phenomenon (in terms of thermallling and final turn stall/spin safety) of the loss of airspeed when we hit sink John Galloway At 21:30 27 March 2005, Robin Birch wrote: In message , Fred writes Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How do you explain it? I've always thought of it as a change in the lift drag vector. If your glider is flying in still air the lift drag vector is pointing up and towards the tail. If rising air is entered, which effectively increases the lift vector the new lift/drag vector points slightly more forward than previously. This reduces the effective drag and the glider accelerates until everything balances out again. This may be total rubbish but it is the model I've found easiest to visualise. Robin -- Robin Birch |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most reasonable explanation and experienced in both weaker UK lift and
strong western US lift. In many cases, ASI response quicker than vario response. Frank "John Galloway" wrote in message ... It's called the Yates Effect and the mechanism described by Yates in Gliding magazine in 1951 is basically an expanded version of what Robin says. Derek Piggot has an Appendix on the subject in Understanding Gliding. The inverse is also the explanation for the more important phenomenon (in terms of thermallling and final turn stall/spin safety) of the loss of airspeed when we hit sink John Galloway At 21:30 27 March 2005, Robin Birch wrote: In message , Fred writes Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How do you explain it? I've always thought of it as a change in the lift drag vector. If your glider is flying in still air the lift drag vector is pointing up and towards the tail. If rising air is entered, which effectively increases the lift vector the new lift/drag vector points slightly more forward than previously. This reduces the effective drag and the glider accelerates until everything balances out again. This may be total rubbish but it is the model I've found easiest to visualise. Robin -- Robin Birch |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 01:30 28 March 2005, Fred wrote:
Terry: That's the way I explained it too, (& BTW, the phenomenon is noticeable in the east too). There should be a more elegant (or simplistic) explanation, don't you think? One that doesn't require diagrams of lift vectors? Fred If you're flying a child's kite in a steady breeze and give a quick yank on the string, the kite goes up. A glider is designed to convert the vertical pull of gravity into nearly horizontal motion. The uprush of air (change in AoA) on entering a thermal has an effect similar to a sudden increase in gravity (if that were possible) pulling the glider downwards through the air. The glider converts that to an increase in forward motion. You are, in effect, getting a brief winch launch every time you enter a thermal. Ed. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One simple explanation and easy to draw for your students: The CG of
the glider is typically ahead of the "center of lift". An "up" gust will cause nose to pitch down around the CG. Refer to "Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators" for more details. Be "one" with your glider. Feeling (and hearing) the slight airspeed change is usually a faster indication of lift than your vario. So look outside the cockpit to clear, pull and turn into the thermal core! Burt Marfa Gliders, west Texas USA www.flygliders.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had the delightful opportunity to fly with Derek Piggott last year
before the Senior Nationals and specifically asked him about this observation. It seems to me that a thermal is a vertical gust that would be noticed by the wing as increase in AOA and hence the airspeed should decrease..but it doesn't? He said, (as best as I can recollect) that "we used to call this the 'Yates Effect' but that this has pretty much fallen from favor. A thermal with an accelerating core creates somewhat of a venturi that will entrain surrounding air and will manifest itself with horizontal gusts as well as the vertical as you enter the thermal". If I took the trouble to graft it out, I would not be able to illustrate this on paper as it would look like a tailwind pushing me into the thermal rather than a frontal gust, but from the cockpit of a G103 with the Jedi-Master it seemed a perfectly simple explanation. Gene |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fred a écrit :
Just got asked this question, didn't have a quick and easy answer. How do you explain it? Does the airspeed really increase on thermal entry ??? I am not convinced of that. I think the opposite is true : when the airspeed increases, due to entry into a thermal, turbulence or any other reason, you TE-compensated-variometer believes there is a lift ! -- Denis R. Parce que ça rompt le cours normal de la conversation !!! Q. Pourquoi ne faut-il pas répondre au-dessus de la question ? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An odd clearance...can anyone explain? | Andrew Gideon | Instrument Flight Rules | 32 | September 18th 04 09:35 PM |
TEC, can anyone use small words and explain this to me? | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | November 16th 03 05:51 PM |
Please explain | T3 | Military Aviation | 28 | November 14th 03 11:11 PM |
Can anyone explain what TFR's are supposed to do? | Corky Scott | Piloting | 33 | October 23rd 03 12:42 PM |
Can someone explain wing loading? | Frederick Wilson | Home Built | 4 | September 10th 03 02:33 AM |