ct?

You have excellent taste. From what I have seen, this looks like a
killer
design. Problem is, I haven't seen enough.

I have reservations about the engine and the wing construction.

Do you know if someone is going to build a reasonable Rotax support
system
in this country? Can you find a Rotax trained AP in your area?

Does anyone know the strength of the wing? It doesn't sound all that
strong
from what I have read. Is the wing easily replaced, repaired, or
inspected.
I just have a problem with a foam core construction outside of the
experimental world.

I can't comment on the integrity of this design. However, there is
another plane out there that looks remarkably like this one, but has
struts (and the wings fold as well). It is called the Remos G3, and you
can check it out at www.rlsa.us/remos.htm. It would definitely be on my
short list if I were in the market for a LSA.

David Johnson

verrry interesting. looks like the same bird ok except that, as you
mentioned, they configured it a little differently what with the struts
and folding wings. interior is somewhat different. is the sitting angle
the same as in the ct? this one looks more
in repose".

without looking up euro/dollar conversion, looks about 1/3 more
expensive than the ct but with some really cool features. folds into a
glider box? saves me 250$/month hanger....maybe?? i'm really interested
to see what other light sport craft get certified in the next little
while. very cool time to be in the market.

dan

wrote)
I can't comment on the integrity of this design. However, there is
another plane out there that looks remarkably like this one, but has
struts (and the wings fold as well). It is called the Remos G3, and you
can check it out at www.rlsa.us/remos.htm. It would definitely be on my
short list if I were in the market for a LSA.


Do many people tie-down their planes this way?
http://www.rlsa.us/REMOSphotos/donau/donau55-m.jpg
(From the Remos G3 website)


Montblack