A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Turbine air start -- too cold?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 15th 05, 10:45 PM
Jim Carriere
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Colibri wrote:
Sean Trost wrote:

I stand corrected. Thanks Jim. Learned somthing new everyday.
Sean

Jim Carriere wrote:

Sean Trost wrote:

Juan
I believe that N1 is related to the velocity of the airstream
introduced. Which is good. But not related to the ignition problem
Now You have said that you have an excellent spark and good fuel.
the only other thing you need for start is the right airflow. or
volumn. Dont know about your engine specifically but most everything
else runs right around 14 to 1 on the ratio wise.



Actually, jets are a different beast from piston engines. Between
about 25:1 and 50:1 is normal, even for lightoff fuel flow.
Stoichiometrically correct combustion is too hot.



50:1 would be the total airflow:fuel ratio through the engine core. Of
those 50 parts air, 15 are primary air that mixes with the fuel for
stoichiometrically correct combustion.

The other 35 parts are secondary air (not to be confused with a
turbofan's bypass air, which doesn't pass through the core). Some
secondary air passes around the exterior of the combustion chamber liner
to cool it, and some passes through holes into the chamber to shape the
flame and hold it away from the liner wall to prevent damage.


This is a better explanation than I gave, but I'll elaborate further
to this that while technically only 15 of those parts of air are
"burned" (use to support combustion), and the secondary air begins
mixing with the flame very close to where the fuel nozzle(s) are
located. Depending on the design of the engine, some or even all the
secondary air flowing around the combustor liner mixes with the
primary air/flame before entering the turbine.

Complex engines will route some of the secondary air through tiny
cooling passages in the turbine blades themselves (I'm pretty sure
you, Colibri, understand this, I'm speaking to the group and not
trying to insult you), but I strongly doubt this is the case with
Juan's engine.

None of this is impingement starting air, which hits the turbine blades
and then goes right out the exhaust duct.


This is an important distinction, so is the difference between
secondary and bypass.

  #2  
Old January 16th 05, 04:48 PM
Juan Jimenez
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Carriere" wrote in message
...

This is a better explanation than I gave, but I'll elaborate further to
this that while technically only 15 of those parts of air are "burned"
(use to support combustion), and the secondary air begins mixing with the
flame very close to where the fuel nozzle(s) are located. Depending on
the design of the engine, some or even all the secondary air flowing
around the combustor liner mixes with the primary air/flame before
entering the turbine.

Complex engines will route some of the secondary air through tiny cooling
passages in the turbine blades themselves (I'm pretty sure you, Colibri,
understand this, I'm speaking to the group and not trying to insult you),
but I strongly doubt this is the case with Juan's engine.


You are correct. My engine is not a turbofan, it is a turbojet, circa 1973.

None of this is impingement starting air, which hits the turbine blades
and then goes right out the exhaust duct.


This is an important distinction, so is the difference between secondary
and bypass.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
turbine in microturbine generator for aircraft? Shin Gou Home Built 19 December 26th 04 02:19 PM
Alternate turbine fuel Robert Bates Home Built 24 June 7th 04 07:16 AM
turbine propeller sebastian Home Built 19 March 21st 04 12:47 AM
Pulsar with a turbine? Badwater Bill Home Built 33 August 28th 03 04:02 PM
The Sun is hot but the beer is cold in Iowa! Jay Honeck Home Built 13 July 29th 03 01:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.