![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Steven, as a new Instrument rated pilot, my 'real-world'
experience with the system is pretty limited. And your right, I assumed KIND, when the decision only mentioned Indianopolis. I had assumed that a ground stop (or some other traffic "congestion") was the cause for the lack of clearance into Indianapolis, but the mention in the decision of the weather being below minimums as another reason for not granting a clearance confused me. Assuming a ground stop wasn't in effect (hypothetical situation where noone was going to Indianapolis, other than our wayward pilot) would they still have denied him a clearance because the field was below minimums? There may have been a ground stop for traffic destined for airports served by Indianapolis approach. If so, he can't get a clearance for an airport within IND approach airspace. So ground stop's would affect all aircraft headed for destinations within a given terminal environment, not just a specific airport. That makes sense if you figure that the reason for the ground stop is approach control is overloaded. Adding more airplanes to the system even if they are just stopping at a sattelite field isn't going to help the matter. Sorry for the naive questions. Never had a clearance denied before. Anybody know what happened to him? Did he make it into the airport he was going to? Or was he forced to diver someplace else? The report only makes mention of taking off, not the eventual landing. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "bdl" wrote in message ups.com... Thanks Steven, as a new Instrument rated pilot, my 'real-world' experience with the system is pretty limited. And your right, I assumed KIND, when the decision only mentioned Indianopolis. I had assumed that a ground stop (or some other traffic "congestion") was the cause for the lack of clearance into Indianapolis, but the mention in the decision of the weather being below minimums as another reason for not granting a clearance confused me. Assuming a ground stop wasn't in effect (hypothetical situation where noone was going to Indianapolis, other than our wayward pilot) would they still have denied him a clearance because the field was below minimums? No. Weather at the destination airport is not a basis upon which to deny a departure clearance and the controller working the departure location may not even know what the weather is at the destination. So ground stop's would affect all aircraft headed for destinations within a given terminal environment, not just a specific airport. Not necessarily, but it could. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No. Weather at the destination airport is not a basis upon
which to deny a departure clearance and the controller working the departure location may not even know what the weather is at the destination. Thanks for your help. Brian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Looking for a See and Avoid NTSB report | Ace Pilot | Piloting | 2 | June 10th 04 01:01 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
Senator asks Navy for report on pilot | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | July 17th 03 10:08 PM |