![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree. Nothing like inserting high workload items such as compass turns
into situations where stress has created tunnel vision. Bob wrote in message ... On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:56:39 -0800, "Bob Gardner" wrote: I still think you are wasting your time and that of your students. Compass turns are not practical...that's why they haven't been in the PTS for a long time; it's not just a change in the most recent PTS. Turn coordinator calibration is a non-issue, except for CFII checkrides. So you aim for 270 and end up with 250...is this life-threatening? Easy to fix, and absolutely no one will notice. Anyone who cannot pick two headings off of the heading indicator, count the number of ten-degree/45-degree tick marks between them, and divide by three may not be intellectually suited to aviation. Bob Amen. But why do any dividing at all? Each number on a compass rose is 10 seconds. Count the numbers between your present heading and the desired heading (just go "ten,twenty, thirty...") and interpolate the overage/underage, and you'll be very close when you roll out, with probably one more little turn to tidy up. But you are absolutely right about the compass turn stuff. It's damn near as ridiculous as parallel, teardrop and direct entries. Or "reverse sensing". But let's not go there... "Barry" wrote in message ... Compass turns are not required by the PTS. In my opinion, teaching and practicing compass turns is a complete waste of time that could be more profitably spent on more practical maneuvers. OTOH, timed turns make perfectly good sense.... Compare that with simply rolling into a standard rate turn (still hard to maintain in turbulence) and watching the seconds tick by. BTW, nobody expects you to roll out anywhere close to a desired heading when conditions are really bad. Yes, compass turns are not in the new PTS. However, I think that it's still a skill worth learning. I prefer (and teach) using timing for small turns (heading change 60 degrees or less), and the compass for larger turns. All you really need to remember is that if the desired heading is north, you roll out early, and if the desired heading is south, you go past it before rolling out. This gets you close, and then you used a small timed turn to get closer. I really think this is easier than trying to figure out the time required for say, a right turn from 320 to 180. There's also the effect of the turn coordinator calibration. But I wouldn't insist on compass turns if the pilot makes acceptable timed turns. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
How high can you fly a Cessna 172? | Victor | Piloting | 11 | April 10th 04 10:24 PM |
Strange compass behavior | me | Owning | 10 | February 14th 04 04:24 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
High CHTs on Cessna 175 | Ron Natalie | Owning | 2 | September 9th 03 02:14 AM |