Owning vs. charter vs. airlines

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
k.net...
Those are suppliers, not "deals".


And just how do they manage to "Supply" the company without working out a
deal?


Walmart has never signed a single $4B deal AFAIK. Period. Furthermore I
doubt that *any* supplier has ever lost Walmart as a customer because they
could not arrive somewhere at a particular time.

Mike
MU-2

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
k.net...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
k.net...
Those are suppliers, not "deals".


And just how do they manage to "Supply" the company without working out
a
deal?


Walmart has never signed a single $4B deal AFAIK.

The two I mentioned. Wal-Mart was perhaps the first compnay to do long term
deals with their vendors, which is why they were able to get fabulous deals.

Period. Furthermore I
doubt that *any* supplier has ever lost Walmart as a customer because they
could not arrive somewhere at a particular time.

Read Walton's biography.

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...



Walmart has never signed a single $4B deal AFAIK.

The two I mentioned. Wal-Mart was perhaps the first compnay to do long
term
deals with their vendors, which is why they were able to get fabulous
deals.

Period. Furthermore I
doubt that *any* supplier has ever lost Walmart as a customer because
they
could not arrive somewhere at a particular time.


I also forgot to mention all the corporate buyouts that run well over $4
billion.

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...



Walmart has never signed a single $4B deal AFAIK.

The two I mentioned. Wal-Mart was perhaps the first compnay to do long
term
deals with their vendors, which is why they were able to get fabulous
deals.

Period. Furthermore I
doubt that *any* supplier has ever lost Walmart as a customer because
they
could not arrive somewhere at a particular time.


I also forgot to mention all the corporate buyouts that run well over $4
billion.



Do you think that any of these buyouts or any other $4 transaction hinged on
having a corporate jet?

Mike
MU-2

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
. net...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...



Walmart has never signed a single $4B deal AFAIK.

The two I mentioned. Wal-Mart was perhaps the first compnay to do long
term
deals with their vendors, which is why they were able to get fabulous
deals.

Period. Furthermore I
doubt that *any* supplier has ever lost Walmart as a customer because
they
could not arrive somewhere at a particular time.


I also forgot to mention all the corporate buyouts that run well over $4
billion.



Do you think that any of these buyouts or any other $4 transaction hinged
on
having a corporate jet?


Certainly. Have you ever participated in one? They don't do it my phone
calls and email.

MOF, John Deakin tells the story of one in his article after making the
transition to the G-IV, and how the business crew prepped for their meeting
during the flight. http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/185048-1.html (about
2/3rds down). I rather expect this is the rule more than the exception.

This past week we began our "season" by doing a land buy and then
negotiations with sub-contractors near San Antonio. The entire flight the
contractor foremen were working up scenarios. We did the whole thing in one
day and closed a $1.8M deal on two fronts. This is, of course, chicken feed
compared to the Fortune 50 world.


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
. net...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...



Walmart has never signed a single $4B deal AFAIK.

The two I mentioned. Wal-Mart was perhaps the first compnay to do long
term
deals with their vendors, which is why they were able to get fabulous
deals.

Period. Furthermore I
doubt that *any* supplier has ever lost Walmart as a customer
because
they
could not arrive somewhere at a particular time.


I also forgot to mention all the corporate buyouts that run well over
$4
billion.



Do you think that any of these buyouts or any other $4 transaction hinged
on
having a corporate jet?


Certainly. Have you ever participated in one? They don't do it my phone
calls and email.

Yes I have and over the phone is how most of it is done. Once there is a
conceptual deal, THEN you have the finance people, product people ect start
getting together. Having people flying around to meet in person usually is
discovered and the word gets out. Then the stocks go up and the deal can't
be done. There was a large oil company aquisition that cost over $300MM
more because someone thought it would be secret and clever to hold talks on
their jets while they were parked next to each other. It didn't take a
genius to figure what was going on



MOF, John Deakin tells the story of one in his article after making the
transition to the G-IV, and how the business crew prepped for their
meeting
during the flight. http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/185048-1.html (about
2/3rds down). I rather expect this is the rule more than the exception.

This past week we began our "season" by doing a land buy and then
negotiations with sub-contractors near San Antonio. The entire flight the
contractor foremen were working up scenarios. We did the whole thing in
one
day and closed a $1.8M deal on two fronts. This is, of course, chicken
feed
compared to the Fortune 50 world.


The fact remains that big deals are not lost due to the lack of a coporate
jet to get people somewhere a few hours earlier..

Mike
MU-2

The fact remains that big deals are not lost due to the lack of a coporate
jet to get people somewhere a few hours earlier..

Mike
MU-2


Mike,

I don't believe its established that its a fact. You cannot prove a
negative, so you cannot prove your point. On the other hand, I have seen
multi million dollar deals go south for reasons of people being late, and
other small things.

At a certain level in corporate america, the schedules get tight enough that
even a corporate jet isn't enough to get your top executives around enough
to keep the relationships strong enough. I have hade plenty of experience
with SMB's that get insulted that your Fortune 100 CEO or other C level guy
hasn't been out to see them in person. Sometimes you can overcome that, and
sometimes you can't.

One thing that is even harder to overcome is your guy showing up on late AND
saying the wrong things. This problem has cost me enough to pay for my
airplane, and one jerk who blew it for me left our company (after
mismanaging it as president and COO, and went on to mismanage a bigger
company as CEO for even more money). It pays to have connections on Wall
Sreet. Especially if you are incompetent.

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
. net...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
. net...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...



Walmart has never signed a single $4B deal AFAIK.

The two I mentioned. Wal-Mart was perhaps the first compnay to do
long
term
deals with their vendors, which is why they were able to get
fabulous
deals.

Period. Furthermore I
doubt that *any* supplier has ever lost Walmart as a customer
because
they
could not arrive somewhere at a particular time.


I also forgot to mention all the corporate buyouts that run well over
$4
billion.



Do you think that any of these buyouts or any other $4 transaction
hinged
on
having a corporate jet?


Certainly. Have you ever participated in one? They don't do it my phone
calls and email.

Yes I have and over the phone is how most of it is done.

That's right! We spend days and weeks on the phone before going out and
talking face to face about land, zoning, land use ordnances, contractorsm
sub-contractors...

We do tons of email and fax and FedEx packages seting things up.

Then, we hop in the plane and meet all the parties involved.

Once there is a
conceptual deal, THEN you have the finance people, product people ect
start
getting together. Having people flying around to meet in person usually
is
discovered and the word gets out. Then the stocks go up and the deal
can't
be done. There was a large oil company aquisition that cost over $300MM
more because someone thought it would be secret and clever to hold talks
on
their jets while they were parked next to each other. It didn't take a
genius to figure what was going on

It didn't take a genius to figure out what was going on BEFORE the started
parking jets next to each other (this thing sounds like some goofy
Hollyweird script).

Funny, isn't it, that a few years ago video conferencing and high spped
communications was thought to be the end of flying around and conducting
meetings? Weren't we supposed to telecommute instead of having office space?

Don't even get me started on the "paperless office".

The point isn't (or shouldn't be) that being a bit late is solved by a
business jet. In that you're correct. OTOH, it's not merely a notion that
flying a team out to negotitate and conclude deals face-to-face, with the
"highly compensated employees and executives" is HIGHLY beneficial AFTER a
lot of leg work is completed.


Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO



MOF, John Deakin tells the story of one in his article after making the
transition to the G-IV, and how the business crew prepped for their
meeting
during the flight. http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/185048-1.html
(about
2/3rds down). I rather expect this is the rule more than the exception.

This past week we began our "season" by doing a land buy and then
negotiations with sub-contractors near San Antonio. The entire flight
the
contractor foremen were working up scenarios. We did the whole thing in
one
day and closed a $1.8M deal on two fronts. This is, of course, chicken
feed
compared to the Fortune 50 world.


The fact remains that big deals are not lost due to the lack of a coporate
jet to get people somewhere a few hours earlier..

Which wasn't the point (timing, though that is certainly a MINOR factor).

Mike Rapoport wrote:
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
ink.net...

Those are suppliers, not "deals".


And just how do they manage to "Supply" the company without working out a
deal?



Walmart has never signed a single $4B deal AFAIK. Period. Furthermore I
doubt that *any* supplier has ever lost Walmart as a customer because they
could not arrive somewhere at a particular time.


You know, it doesn't really make a damn bit of difference what deals
Walmart has or has not made, nor does it matter what any other company
has or has not done. The original point was that started this whole
waste of time was the fact that sometimes the "economical" choice winds
up losing you money. This is true whether or not the original example
has ever actually been represented in real life, and it's something that
every company either knows intuitively or soon learns in sorry detail.

Furthermore, in the engineering management world, when a request for
bids says that bids must be received by such-and-such time, then they
better be there at that time. Bids that aren't received on time are
simply not considered - there are usually plenty of bidders who do get
their bids in on time, and if not, the client will probably re-start
the bidding process.

Rich Lemert

Walmart has never signed a single $4B deal AFAIK. Period. Furthermore I
doubt that *any* supplier has ever lost Walmart as a customer because
they could not arrive somewhere at a particular time.


You know, it doesn't really make a damn bit of difference what deals
Walmart has or has not made, nor does it matter what any other company
has or has not done. The original point was that started this whole
waste of time was the fact that sometimes the "economical" choice winds
up losing you money. This is true whether or not the original example
has ever actually been represented in real life, and it's something that
every company either knows intuitively or soon learns in sorry detail.

Furthermore, in the engineering management world, when a request for
bids says that bids must be received by such-and-such time, then they
better be there at that time. Bids that aren't received on time are
simply not considered - there are usually plenty of bidders who do get
their bids in on time, and if not, the client will probably re-start
the bidding process.

Rich Lemert


You can often get a waiver if you show good faith effort, and if you show
that it could not have been changed. For instance, if Fed Ex put it on the
wrong truck.

Still, it doesn't help, and people who don't know how these things work just
really have not seen the pettiness and/or bureaucratic idiocy that goe on
these days. Often, you have a big ego type who is looking to get rid of
competitors so he can choose the vendor who best kisses his arse, or some
power starved purchasing maggot who loves his/her chance to veto the will of
the executive and sales people who all make 3 to 30 times what they make.