![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() F.L. Whiteley wrote: So you make an interesting point. It might be good to allow people to 'verifiably' register for access to an expanded area (either permanently or for some term). This would allow the SSA appropriate leverage also. Frank Second, in a sport which is in great need of increased visibility in the face of decreasing membership, I'd prefer to not lock out anyone that's making an attempt to find out more information about soaring as his/her potential hobby. At some point, this becomes a business decision - a classic demand elasticity exercise. If we charge for content, and that content has value, will some people be willing to pay for it? Conversely, will some people be so offended by the concept as to avoid joining the SSA? I don't know the answer, though it is potentially knowable (with the right type of marketing and survey). On the other hand, I wonder if it's the MOST important issue right now. Seems like the SSA has made a calculated decision, and maybe it would make sense to see if there is any noticeable behavior change. Just a thought... Erik Mann |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Papa3" wrote in message
ups.com... F.L. Whiteley wrote: So you make an interesting point. It might be good to allow people to 'verifiably' register for access to an expanded area (either permanently or for some term). This would allow the SSA appropriate leverage also. Frank Second, in a sport which is in great need of increased visibility in the face of decreasing membership, I'd prefer to not lock out anyone that's making an attempt to find out more information about soaring as his/her potential hobby. At some point, this becomes a business decision - a classic demand elasticity exercise. If we charge for content, and that content has value, will some people be willing to pay for it? Conversely, will some people be so offended by the concept as to avoid joining the SSA? I don't know the answer, though it is potentially knowable (with the right type of marketing and survey). On the other hand, I wonder if it's the MOST important issue right now. Seems like the SSA has made a calculated decision, and maybe it would make sense to see if there is any noticeable behavior change. Just a thought... Erik Mann Hi Erik, It seems there might be a missing component, that is, finding those interested enough to register, but not yet committed to membership. Not unlike the one or three flight trial lesson offerings discussion. EAA have options inside the membership, with additional specialty magazines, offered at a cost plus pricing. I can think of one significant missed opportunity, and at least one or two potential items. Committees tend to distill things down to black and white options. Once that's done, we either have those that buy-in or those that don't and no visible choices in-between. We don't gain any knowledge about why not from those that don't, so any future decisions remain shots in the dark. Survey? Who are we going to survey? We need to consider building in a mechanism of discovery. That's what I'm suggesting. Frank Whiteley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 11:14 PM |
The Auction Hangar - Completely free aviation auction site. | The Auction Hangar | General Aviation | 1 | April 6th 04 07:17 AM |
The Auction Hangar - Completely free aviation auction site. | The Auction Hangar | Owning | 0 | April 6th 04 12:58 AM |
The Auction Hangar - Completely free aviation auction site. | The Auction Hangar | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 6th 04 12:58 AM |
The Auction Hangar - Completely free aviation auction site. | The Auction Hangar | Home Built | 0 | April 6th 04 12:57 AM |