![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
keep the DB current and there's certainly no reason at all they should
expect that I do). no one except the PIC checks to make sure a plane's panel-mounted database is current. ATC sure doesn't. No kidding. My point was that, being that it's a _VFR_ GPS and that I did _not_ file /G, I am under no regulatory requirement at all to keep it current. What you are saying is the equivalent of a /G airplane with out of date databases. You are NOT legal to fly IFR with out of date databases (there are exceptions but in general, the answer is no). Yes, there are exceptions for enroute ops, but that's another matter. Not to be Mr. Police Officer or mean about it.....you said you are newly minted IFR pilot when did you take your written test? Did you study the Gleim. there are only about 10 questions on GPS including a couple on the exact thing you are asking about. I took mine not too long ago (my checkride is coming up) I took it it November and got a 98%. I am aware of the regs governing IFR GPS use. No offense, but you missed my point. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What you are saying is the equivalent of a /G airplane with out of date databases. You are NOT legal to fly IFR with out of date databases (there are exceptions but in general, the answer is no). Not true. It depends on the individual GPS. RTFM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(there are exceptions but in general, the answer is no).
Not true. It depends on the individual GPS. RTFM. There are exceptions.....it depends...... ummm, we're saying the same thing, aren't we? Agreed, RTFM always applies hence the indefinite statements. Gerald |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() G. Sylvester wrote: (there are exceptions but in general, the answer is no). Not true. It depends on the individual GPS. RTFM. There are exceptions.....it depends...... ummm, we're saying the same thing, aren't we? There is no FAR that says the database must be current. The law is whatever the manufacturer says it is in the manual. It's just the opposite of what you said, most of the time an expired database is OK. Especially for terminal and enroute ops. Only for approaches is it pretty standard that the databse be current. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
G. Sylvester wrote: (there are exceptions but in general, the answer is no). Not true. It depends on the individual GPS. RTFM. There are exceptions.....it depends...... ummm, we're saying the same thing, aren't we? There is no FAR that says the database must be current. The law is whatever the manufacturer says it is in the manual. To pick a nit: actually it's whatever it says in the Pilot's Operating Handbook Supplement. The manufacturer supplies a boilerplate suggested wording for the SPOH and *usually* that's what gets sent in to Oklahoma City for the approval, which is approved (or not) for each individual aircraft. I don't think there's anything preventing someone sending in different wording, and if it gets approved, it's approved. I don't know whether that's actually ever been done. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Clearance: Direct to airport with /U | Judah | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | February 27th 04 06:02 PM |
Direct To a waypoint in flightplan on Garmin 430 | Andrew Gideon | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | February 18th 04 01:31 AM |
"Direct when able" | Mitchell Gossman | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | October 21st 03 01:19 AM |
Filing direct | John Harper | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | October 9th 03 10:23 AM |
Don Brown and lat-long | Bob Gardner | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | September 29th 03 03:24 AM |