Avgas in France has reached $7.50/gal !

"Wolfgang Schwanke" wrote in message
...
"Matt Barrow" wrote in
:

http://www.timbro.com/euvsusa/ (EU vs. USA) by a think tank in
Stockholm, Sweden Read particularly the summary at the bottom and some
of he charts comparing the various EU countries against the US.

Of course, the results of such surveys depend on the political leanings
of the authors. Authors who favour a neoliberal policy will come to
results that portray the US as better, so to encourage Europeans to
mimick American policies. Economics isn't a science,

Paul Krugman thinks it is...at least Keynesian economics, that is.


it's ideology to a
large extent.

Find the source of their data and report back.


Regards

Refute

In article ,
says...


Paul Krugman thinks it is...at least Keynesian economics, that is.



Keynesian economics, which applies a supply-and-demand model to the labor
market, was developed before the advent of large scale spcial programs, which
resulted in a significant proportion of a society being paid more not to work
than they would earn working.

You like sources? LA TRIBUNE (French economic daily) reported yesterday the
results of a governmant analysis which showed that most people presently
benefiting from "reinsertion" welfare will earn less when they actually do get
a job. This is considered to be a big hurdle for Mr Douste-Blazy (minister of
health and "family affairs") who has the daunting task of trying to propose a
reform for this type of social welfare.

"G Farris" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...


Paul Krugman thinks it is...at least Keynesian economics, that is.



Keynesian economics, which applies a supply-and-demand model to the labor
market, was developed before the advent of large scale spcial programs,
which
resulted in a significant proportion of a society being paid more not to
work
than they would earn working.

Could you cite the part of Keynes work that states this? :~)


You like sources? LA TRIBUNE (French economic daily) reported yesterday
the
results of a governmant analysis which showed that most people presently
benefiting from "reinsertion" welfare will earn less when they actually do
get
a job. This is considered to be a big hurdle for Mr Douste-Blazy (minister
of
health and "family affairs") who has the daunting task of trying to
propose a
reform for this type of social welfare.

That's just their opinion.


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 08:20:29 -0700, Matt Barrow wrote:

You like sources? LA TRIBUNE (French economic daily) reported yesterday
the
results of a governmant analysis which showed that most people presently
benefiting from "reinsertion" welfare will earn less when they actually do
get
a job. This is considered to be a big hurdle for Mr Douste-Blazy (minister
of
health and "family affairs") who has the daunting task of trying to
propose a
reform for this type of social welfare.

That's just their opinion.

and it is a FRENCH opinion. Now come on, you can't be serious with FRENCH
opinions.

#m
--
http://www.hotze.priv.at/album/aviation/caution.jpg

In article ,
says...



Keynesian economics, which applies a supply-and-demand model to the labor
market, was developed before the advent of large scale spcial programs,
which
resulted in a significant proportion of a society being paid more not to
work
than they would earn working.

Could you cite the part of Keynes work that states this? :~)


Let's read my statement again, and I think we'll agree the statement suggests
Keynes work pre-dated this state of affairs, and thus cannot, by itself,
suffice to analyse today's labor market, which has been affected by social
programs beyond any recognition by someone of Keynes' era.


You like sources? LA TRIBUNE (French economic daily) reported yesterday
the
results of a governmant analysis which showed that most people presently
benefiting from "reinsertion" welfare will earn less when they actually do
get
a job. This is considered to be a big hurdle for Mr Douste-Blazy (minister
of
health and "family affairs") who has the daunting task of trying to
propose a
reform for this type of social welfare.

That's just their opinion.


Which part of it is opinion? I thought you had just demonstrated to us that
economists do not have opinions. Anyway, these "opinions" are far more
pertinent to the present-day situation in France than your 1930's novel.

G Faris